User talk:Dotsdomain

Welcome!

Hi Dotsdomain! I noticed your contributions to Bridget Phillipson and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 21:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, I'm QuicoleJR. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sarah Montague, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I have removed the unsourced content, but the other edits remain intact. Please provide sources for those two paragraphs. Thank you. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Vladimir Lenin are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Thedarkknightli (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Ricky Hatton".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

U-Mos (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 09:33, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

== Introduction to contentious topics ==

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

(t · c) buidhe 02:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buidhe You're mistaken! Please be kind enough to remove your post. Dotsdomain (talk) 03:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This prohibition applies to all edits that mention the Arab—Israeli conflict, including talk pages, with an exception for wp:edit requests. (t · c) buidhe 03:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're still mistaken, I gave examples of the BBC bias when they erroneously reported matters already in the public domain. I haven't edited anything that belonged to the war. It is about whether the BBC is a reliable source or not, not the ethics of the conflict. Dotsdomain (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are allowed to give the examples regarding Trump, but you may not mention anything to do with the Arab–Israeli conflict until you are extended confirmed.

My personal advice would be to edit a more quiet area of the encyclopedia until you have a bit more experience in how to resolve conflicts. I am not exaggerating when I say that the Arab–Israeli conflict is our most controversial topic, and that American politics is another nasty space. It is much more fun to edit about more chill areas :) House Blaster (talk • he/they) 04:46, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 04:46, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logged warning for violations of extended confirmed restriction in Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic

Hi Dotsdomain, as your account is not yet extended confirmed, please note that your comments Special:Diff/1320403643 and Special:Diff/1320498688 are prohibited by the extended confirmed restriction (ECR), which applies to edits which overlap with the Arab–Israeli conflict (WP:CT/A-I) contentious topic on all Wikipedia pages, with the exception of making constructive edit requests on article talk pages.

This message is a warning against violating ECR in the Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic, and has been recorded in the arbitration enforcement log. According to your editing history, you have currently made a total of 225 edits on the English Wikipedia. Your account will automatically become extended confirmed once you have made over 500 edits on the English Wikipedia. Until then, please ensure that your edits conform with the restriction. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 09:16, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. [1][2] Rambling Rambler (talk) 10:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dotsdomain, I'd also like to add that your edit to that page was clear editorializing, which contravenes Wikipedia's requirements that articles be neutrally worded. You made the same issue recently at Tommy Robinson. I'd suggest you stay away from articles about current politics and edit something less controversial for a while, to gain more experience. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Rambling Rambler (talk) 02:32, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been banned from English Wikipedia by the consensus of the Wikipedia community. Appealing this ban can be done by following the procedures detailed at WP:UNBAN.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:03, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]