Archives

Archive 1

Thank you for taking my very bare stub and expanding it tremendously! I'd planned to come back and add some more details, but you beat me to it. By the way, I ran across this topic as a red link in Khin Myo Chit, an article whose sourcing I've been improving. pburka (talk) 00:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Unfortunately, not sure if I know enough sources off the top of my head for Khin Myo Chit to help there yet. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EmeraldRange, Wikipedia is developed through WP:CONSENSUS. Please do not remove quality templates added by other editors, as you have done here, without discussion and consensus. The template should remain in place until CONSENSUS is achieved. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3 (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Irony Milk tea alliance is lie! Why believes these people about fake democracy protest. Majority Thai protest for democracy is Ultranationalist and anti monarchy. Why they fake cooperation with Myanmar protest because NGO support 1.47.148.79 (talk) 04:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religion_in_Myanmar&diff=prev&oldid=1274139915 check it again carefully — Cerium4B—Talk? • 17:10, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @EmeraldRange ??? — Cerium4B—Talk? • 17:38, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 17:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	Myanmar Barnstar of National Merit
	Delighted we now have a good editor from Myanmar working on townships and villages at a time where more information is becoming available! Keep up the great work! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:44, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did a fair bit of initial work on the country starting districts and townships and villages in the west of the country over ten years ago but at the time there was very little available and I didn't have the time to expand everything! I hoped enough information would become available to at least have articles on all the Village Tracts. Some articles should probably be deleted or merged, it's good that you found Paga is a dud, GeoNames must have made an error!

@Dr. Blofeld Thanks for your kind words! I'm slowly working through the townships but will also review and expand other villages and village tracts as they come up. MIMU pcodes alone are still questionably enough to meet the requirements for now, but they’re still a great tool for backing up the articles you've created. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the districts and townships are priority. Some of the village stubs would be better off redirected or deleted for the time being if no info can be found. When I started them I was envisaging a day when Myanmar has a great article on everywhere, with the coverage you'd expect in western countries. It would have been better to wait until more info becomes available and work on the larger towns and districts first. A decent township article with a list of Village Tracts is definitely the way to go first. Keep up the great work Emerald! I will likely do some more work on Myanmar this summer! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naf War, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naf War (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a kitten! Kittens help promote WikiLove, and the editor that placed this wants to thank you for your recent contributions to List of populated places affected by the 2025 Myanmar earthquake!

Aydoh8^[contribs] 18:06, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! The kitten is extremely cute and has definitely made this day better. 💕💕 EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 18:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 22:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 23:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Anti-Wikibullying Barnstar
		Hey Dude! Hope you are doing well, and if in case you were in Myanmar, I hope you are safe! I wanted to thank you for whatever you have done, and for standing by for the integrity of Wikipedia, and for protecting new Wikipedians, from constant POV bullying. Thanks for guiding me, and showing me the ropes on how to approach discussions in Wikipedia :) Can't thank you enough for defending new editors like me. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 02:38, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Me and my family are all luckily safe. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 13:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook source can be use if the publisher is real media/news. Hteiktinhein (talk) 08:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No it cannot. See WP:FACEBOOK. It is only generally allowed if it's used to support something as a primary source of the topic itself. For example, on an article about a person if a facebook post of that person says they like dogs, you can use that post to support it. If the article is about Voice of Myanmar, you can use their facebook post in the article about Voice of Myanmar only. သတင်းမီဒီယာအတွက် မရဘူး။ EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 08:57, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FACEBOOK says As a reliable source: Sometimes. The official page of a subject may be used as a self-published, primary source, but only if it can be authenticated as belonging to the subject. Hteiktinhein (talk) 09:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. As belonging to the subject, not as a third-party source. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 09:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So what about YouTube? Hteiktinhein (talk) 09:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's allowed per WP:RSYT (unlike WP:RSPFACEBOOK) if uploaded from a verified news source- treated like if you saw the same video on TV. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 09:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I realize I confused WP:FACEBOOK with another WP:YOUTUBE-EL. Hteiktinhein (talk) 04:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nattalin Township, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hlaingthaya East Township, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I apologize for missing the tribulationattribution in the original edit summary. -- Whpq (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no worries! Thanks for your vigilance. I was a bit sleepy and misttyped the main page I copied from, so technically misattributed. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey as someone with strong ties to Chin State, I was hoping to create a separate wikiproject for Chin State. Could you guide me on how to do this. I know a few more Zo Editors who would be willing to join. I wanted this to be something similar to Wikipedia:WikiProject Mizoram or others, in WP:India. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would look at WP:PROJGUIDE. Generally WikiProjects help to organise the effort of editors. But for even something like WP:MYANMAR they are much more loosely useful to collect information given the small amount of editors. I don't know if there's a similar need for Chin State. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 18:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Yep indeed true. Maybe I could work on proposing a merge Wikiproject Mizoram and the one for chin state? This should help organise zo related content on Wikipedia a lot. Not sure how this would work though Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 19:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Typically for things like that, the WP are generally based on what helps the editors. A lot of Burmese-Chinese border ethnicities or Burmese-Thai border issues are simply just listed on both Wikiprojects. Wikiprojects help unfamiliar editors tag pages, deletion, move requests, etc with the right group to get attention so it might not be worth just tagging zo related content (as it kind of already is) with both wikiprojects. Even then most editors will tag WP:INDIA not WP:Mizoram EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 21:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm true. I’m just tryna find a way for us to coordinate in a better way. There are a lot of things related to both Mizoram and Chin state, that aren’t updated- and it’s quite hard to find sources especially for things that you know are notable but hard to establish them as notable. If you know what I mean Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 22:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was assigned to create a Wiki page for a figure a year ago, which you reviewed. Someone changed the portrait recently and it was not to the figure's liking, so I logged back in and changed it back--on the English page, but on the Indonesian page it says I've been blocked by someone I had no idea whomsoever who accused me of being someone else I had no idea whomsoever. Now I have no idea how Wikipedia works, and I couldn't "mail" or "comment" on that user's page since--well, he blocked me. I know this doesn't concern you at the very least but I don't know any administrators... the funniest thing is that this blocker seems so sure that he got the right man... It's on the page of Edy Junaedi, the only page I have made. You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: Your username or IP address has been blocked. The block was made by ‪Fazoffic‬. The reason given is Hahaha! Setelah salah blokir beberapa kali, akhirnya ketemu range IP Anda wahai LTA binson!. Start of block: 10:21, 25 May 2025 Expiration of block: 10:21, 25 August 2025 Intended blockee: 202.10.61.0/24 You can contact ‪Fazoffic‬ or another administrator to discuss the block. You can use the "Email this user" feature if a valid email address is specified in your preferences and you have not been blocked from using it. Your current IP address is 202.10.61.191. Block ID #98956. Please include all above details in any queries you make. Zahraahmar (talk) 15:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin but you can file an appeal at H:B to an admin. It looks like your username is not blocked or only blocked on Indonesian wiki. Sounds like the admin "Fazoffic" blocked your IP address to block another editor. You are unlikely to get an IP address unblocked but you should be able to edit if your username is not blocked as well. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 15:30, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to say that I didn't just made my own claim about Möng Mao and have properly researched events and dates provided by scholars. Möng Mao did expanded into a hegemony across Eastern and Upper Burma. Let's have a talk if you're not convinced. Nerogrove96 (talk) 04:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Without providing a source in the actual text you edit, it is a claim. As mentioned, Lanna formed afterwards, and you yourself mentioned Kengtung and some other states exists not just Mong Mao. The Möng Mao page additionally describes Luchuan-Pingmian, Muang Yang and Hsenwi as well. It's inaccurate to claim that only Mong Mao immediately succeeded. The Shan States page paints a better picture of the general Tai/Shan migration into Indochina during the Yuan dynasty that incldues, Mong Mao, Lanna and relatedly Sukhothai etc. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 04:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I do agree that Möng Mao did not immediately start expanding until the 1340s. But the early States beforehand were just native chiefdoms subject to Dali's administration and the later Yuan dynasty. The Shan states in Myanmar and maybe Yunnan as well pre-Möng Mao would be early settlements or native governors and not yet well established (see the Upper Burma gazetteer for details). Lanna have already been formed by the 13th century and had semi-controlled Kengtung by the Mengrai family according to their native Chronicles. The Luchuan-Pingmian was the title granted to Si Kefa in 1355 to manage his territories on behalf of the Yuan dynasty (see Daniels 2018, Kirigaya 2015, and other Chinese works). Before that 'Luchuan' was the name of the Luchuan route (only Möng Mao, other Shan States had different names) recognized by the Yuan court since 1276 (Daniels, Jiang Yingliang, and the Yuanshi). Currently, the narrative of Shan history in Wikipedia needs to be fleshed out from contradicting dates and events of older works to recent, more valid ones, and I will try to cite what I edit. But overall, it would make more sense for Shan states to come after Möng Mao after it was atomized and restructured by the Ming dynasty (see Wade 2004). Nerogrove96 (talk) 05:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also the reason why I mentioned Kengtung and Möng Lu is because I believe they should be viewed as a separate polity under the Lanna/Northern Thai yoke rather than Mong Mao/Shan. Scholars would generally agree there's enough cultural difference between them and the Baiyizhuan also categorized Lanna as a separate polity. Nerogrove96 (talk) 06:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe naratively the "Shan States" article should have the scope of covering all the Shan States- including Möng Mao and the Federated Shan States based on the article covering both the Burmese and Chinese Shan States. The historical narratives going by national modern boundaries is really the only thing that would justify Möng Mao not being treated a separate entity from the vague concept of the "Shan States". You're very right though that the historical narrative of Shan history is very contradictory but that's reflective of the sources themselves being highly contradictory.

Hsenwi, Möng Mao and "Pong" appear to be other states prior to 1287 at the very least. The traditional Burmese histriograph (see Htin Aung 1967 or Harvey 1925) generally characterises the post-Bagan rise of Shan states as a general rise in the influence and power of migrating Tai/Shan people who may or may not have integrated/taken over pre-existing Palaungic statelets. Of course, all of this is complicated by most of these Zomian states lacking a centralised authority. Hence, I think it covers more bases to say that there were likely Shan states in the post-Bagan period instead of a singular state called Möng Mao.

I'm mostly relying on Fernquest 2005 ("Min-gyi-nyo, the Shan Invasions of Ava") and Fernquest, Jon (Autumn 2006). "Crucible of War: Burma and the Ming in the Tai Frontier Zone (1382–1454)" on the specifics of Möng Mao being considered a Shan State. The overall narrative history that I am familiar with is the one laid out in Sai Aung Tun "History of the Shan State: From Its Origins to 1962" which does unfortunately gloss over Möng Mao. Again, this is because of modern national histriography- the Chinese Shan States are characterised as being subject to Dali and the Burmese Shan States characterised barely mentioning Dali.

Generally, I think after reconsidering and looking at your sources, my original revert was rash- but I think it's incorrect to say that the Shan States only appareared after Möng Mao's collapse. That's why I've added both Möng Mao and Shan States to the Bagan article. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Teahouse § Monopoly on Wikipedia pages. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 20:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Htantabin, Bago. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and only source does not appear to mention ထန်းတပင်မြို့. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:34, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Htantabin, Yangon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Only source does not appear to mention ထန်းတပင်မြို့. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:34, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Onel5969 I believe these are covered under WP:NGEO, right? The Bago one uses ထန်းတပင်မြို့မ (i.e. Central Htantabin Town) in its map on Page 10, Page 12 also discusses the history of the establishment of the town and its wards. Page 19 provides the urban population, etc. The Yangon one similarly has a dedicated town map for ထန်းတပင်မြို့ on Page 11, Page 13 for history, Page 18 for urban population etc. "Urban" meaning town as opposed to the township as a whole.

I also added some news sources I could find, but they don't seem newsworthy. I wanted to discuss before moving the page back to mainspace to prevent unnecessary publishing. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 13:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, yeah, they are recognized places. The issue was I couldn't find them in the source. In the future, if you provide the page numbers in the citations, that would be a great help. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will definitely do so. thanks. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 16:54, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EmeraldRange. Thank you for your work on Zeyathiri District. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a courtesy message to notify you in case you haven't seen the Wikipedia:The World Destubathon contest update in the last few days that we've decided to run the full month until the 16th of July. For those who have been too busy to contribute, we would love some help in reaching 4000 articles by Wednesday night! At present we're about 480 articles short!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:47, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing KhantWiki using AI-generated content. I was already hesitant to call it out, but Ive told him countless times that AI-generated material is not allowed on Wikipedia. It only creates extra work for other editors who have to clean up his mess. I even warned him not to move drafts to mainspace without AfC approval and to just wait for proper review. He always says “I understand” and pretends to know everything lol but his actions say otherwise. Now he iss gone ahead and moved most of his rejected drafts himself, completely ignoring the process. I am done tolerating this nonsense. He is seems stubborn, refuses to listen, and thinks he is some kind of leader of Myanmar Wikipedia. I used to treat him like my wiki learner, but not anymore. I am seriously fed up and I have had enough of his iron head attitude. ZZzzz Hteiktinhein (talk) 19:03, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	Stork
	For Your Incredible Research! Daseyn (talk)12:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EmeraldRange. Thank you for your work on Bawyan. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:58, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey EmeraldRange, I know you're pretty concerned and distressed about the over use of AI and misuse of sources in my articles, just as you had said that it's the same pattern in my articles, I want to let you know that, finally, for the first time in my career in Wikipedia and also in life, I created a Wikipedia article entirely myself, the writing, sources, templates, short description, everything are all done by me. No tools, no ai machine or chatgpt written content are used. It's pure skills and writing ethic. The article name is Draft:Director Ko Pauk, you may know him as well, he is a prominent Burmese actor turned resistance movement revolutionary. When I wrote the article, I really enjoyed writing it. Please check it out. It's very important. KhantWiki (talk) 05:58, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job @KhantWiki, I fixed some minor issues like the formatting of sources but all the sources match the content. The only one I couldn't find was your claim that he is born in 1975 in Pyay. Also Pyay is not in Mandalay Region. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you EmeraldRange, it's only thanks to you, Hteiktinhein and Htanaungg's help that you all helped me get to be on the correct path of Wikipedia to obediently follow and obey the policies, rules and guidelines of Wikipedia no doubt about it that AI is horrid when it comes to Wikipedia. Great work for fixing it. The sources being formatted differently is because I used the auto format option to copy the source and then paste it as a reference to make it easier to edit and to insert it, so the Wikipedia system may sometimes make error, if you prefer that I should add sources myself and not automatically, in this case automatic adding of source is the best for me right now due it being easy and handy to use, so no major or even minor problem at all. He is 100% born in 1975 because in this source it's written as "အနာဂတ် မရေရာသော်လည်း အသက် ၅၀ အရွယ် တောထဲရောက် ရုပ်ရှင်ဒါရိုက်တာမှာ စစ်အာဏာရှင်တော်လှန်ရေးကိုသာ ရှေးရှုထားသည်။" (Despite an uncertain future, the 50-year-old filmmaker in the jungle is looking forward to a revolution against the military dictatorship. In this same source, we can use it to support another important claim, "မန္တလေးတိုင်း ပျော်ဘွယ်မြို့တွင် ကြီးပြင်းခဲ့သူ ကိုပေါက်မှာ ၁၉၉၅ ခုနှစ်တွင် အနုပညာလောကကို စတင် ရောက်ရှိခဲ့သူဖြစ်သည်။" (Ko Pauk, who grew up in Pyay Township, Mandalay Region, first entered the art world in 1995.) His birth of place is Pyay, Bago Region, it's not in Mandalay Region. Another very interesting assessment that I have is that in this source from October 12, 2022, Director Ko Pauk is 50 here, as of today's month and year and is December 2025, which means he would be around 53 years old now. I'm even concluding that his birth of date could be 1971/1972/1973 right now, because the birth of date is still showing as his age being 50 years, at that time it may be right, but time have passed and if it's still 50, it cannot be possible. He might be 53 or 52 or 51 if you like. KhantWiki (talk) 02:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ပျော်ဘွယ် is not Pyay.... Khant it's obvious when you use AI because you write these really long paragraphs that don't actually mean or say anything. You don't have to translate Burmese to me, it's my mother language.

There is nothing wrong with still learning how to cite properly. See the guide at WP:CITE.

You do not need to add a bunch of excessive sources for no reason- it only makes it look like you are hiding the actual information lacking sources.

I'm responding to you as if I'm talking to an AI because time and time again it seems very hard to explain these things to you when you respond and say that you understand. If you don't understand, please just say so. မြန်မာလိုဘဲပြောဖို့လိုလဲရတယ်။ ဒါပေမဲ့ဒီလိုရှင်ပြရတာက အင်္ဂလိပ်စာမတက်လို့လဲမဟုတ်ဘူး။ ကျွန်တော်ကော တခြားမြန်မာ wiki editorတွေလဲ ခဏခဏရှင်ပြနေရတယ်။ EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 03:27, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the whole situation now. I guess it's a mistranslation done by Google Translate to translate Pyawbye Township as Pyay. I didn't use any AI in this discussion, I never use it anywhere including discussions, and now I'm completely stopping the use of AI everywhere including on creating articles. Now I also found out that Google Translate is also 100% not always accurate. I'm just glad that it's my first time creating this article entirely myself with no high technology assistance. Now I get it. Pyay and Pyawbye Township are not the same. Pyay is from Bago Region, in which the Myanmar Now source didn't indicate that he was born in Bago Regio. He was born in Mandalay Region, the region which Pyawbye Township is located in, where Director Ko Pauk was born. The confusion done by the Google Translation just made everything feel off. Otherwise we have the answer that he could be 53 and he was born in Pyaybwe Township, Mandalay. Now we have got the answer that we need. မြန်မာလိုပြော်ဖို့လဲအဆင်ပြေပါတယ်။ ကျွန်တော် AI သုံးဖို့လုံဝရပ်လိုက်ပါပြီ အဲ့ article စတည်ထောင်ပြီရော မထောင်ခင်တုံးကရော။ နဲနဲလွဲမှားသွားတာတစ်ခုက ကျွန်တော်ကို Google Translate က ပျော်ဘွယ်မြို့ကို Pyay ဆိုပြီဘာသာပြန်တယ် အခုမှပြန်စစ်လိုက်တော့မှသဘောပေါက်တယ်။ Director Ko Pauk က ပျော်ဘွယ်မြို မန္တ‌လေးဒေသ မှာမွေးတာပါ။ အဲ့ဒါကိုကျွန်တော်လဲ Google Translate ကမှန်တယ်ထင်တယ်ဆိုပြီတော့ထည့်မိ့သွားတာ အဲ့မှာအကုန်တလွဲ‌တွေဖြစ်ကုန်တယ်။ ပျော်ဘွယ်ကို Pyay လို့ရေးပြီဆိုတော့မှားသွားတယ်။ တောင်းပန်းပါတယ်အကို။ သင်ခန်းစာရသွားတာတော့ ဘယ် AI ဘယ် technology နဲ့ပက်သက်တဲ့ဟာမှယုံလို့မရဘူးဖြစ်နေတယ်။ လူအရည်ချင်နဲ့စဉ်စားတွေးခေါ်နိုင်ကိုးမမှိတာ။ KhantWiki (talk) 22:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@KhantWiki ပြောချင်တာက အသေးမွှားMinor အမည်လေးတွေကတော့ သေချာစစ်သင့်ပါတယ်, ဘာပဲသူံးသူံး အမည်တွေကတော့ လူလောက် ဘယ်အရာမှ မှန်ကန်အောင် ဘာသာမပြန်နိုင်ပါဘူး, ဒီလောက်ထိ wikiမေကျင်လည်ပြီးတော့ ဒီလိုသေးငယ်တဲ့ အမှားမျိုး မလုပ်မိအောင်ဂရုစိုက်ပါ...Translate သူံးတာ သူံးရပ့ါတယ် ဒါပေမဲ့ လူကိုယ်တိုင်စီလျှော်အောင် ဘာသာပြန် အဖျက်အတောက်ပြန်လုပ်ဖို့ (အချောကိုင်ဖို့လိုအပ်ပါတယ်).... ရှေလျှောက် aiထပ်detectမိရင် ကယ်လို့ မရတော့တဲ့အခြေနေမို့ ဂရုစိုက်ဖို့ပဲပြောချင်ပါတယ် Hteiktinhein (talk) 09:47, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with Myanmar-related articles. Yue🌙 (talk) 03:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yum! :) EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 03:27, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

အကို မေးစရာရှိလို့ ကျွန်တော့်ထပ်policyနှံ့စပ်တော့ မသိတဲ့အပိုင်းတခုရှိတယ်, ဘယ်ကနေစလုပ်ရမလဲမသိလို့ . တခြား Editorတစ်ယောက်က အပုတ်ချ စော်ကား အခြေမြစ်မရှိပဲ စွပ်စွဲနေတယ် ဆို ဘယ်လို လုပ်ရမလဲ သူရဲ့ Talk pageမှာ အရင်ဆုံး Warning ပေးရမှာလား, edit warအတွက် သုံးခ့ တိတိ Talk pageမေ စာပို့သတိပေးရပေမဲ့ personal attackကြ အဲ့လိုပဲ ၃ခါပို့စရာလိုလား? ဒါမှ မဟုတ် ANI တန်းဖွင့်ရမှာလား? ပြီးတော့ Dispute solution noticeboardဆိုတာလဲရှိသေးတော့ ဘယ်လိုကိုင်တွယ်ရမလဲ မသိလို့... အတိတ်မှာ ကိုယ်တွေ ရွဲ့စောင်းလေးပြောမိရင်တောင် ဝိုင်းကိုက်လိုက်ကြတာ ....​လှုပ်လို့တောင်မရခဲ့ဘူး. အခု ကိုယ်လဲ အဲ့လို ခံနေရရင် ဘာအရင်လုပ်သင့်လဲ ဘယ်လို Template သတိပေးဖို့သုံးရမလဲ? အာရုံလာနောက်နေတဲ့ ခွေးတွေရှိလို့ တကယ် မောတယ်...ကျေးဇူး အကို Hteiktinhein (talk) 12:31, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

အကောင်းဆုံးကတော့ စိတ်လျှော့ပြီး မေတ္တာပို့ပေး🤣။ Personal attack လုပ်တဲ့သူတွေက အများကြီးဘဲ။ သာမန်ဆိုရင်တော့ personal attack လာလုပ်ရင် ပြန်ပြီး WP:CIVIL သို့ WP:GF ကိုလိုက်နာပါလို့ပြန်ပြောပြီး နှစ်ဘက်လုံး စိတ်လျှော့ဖို့ အကောင်းဆုံးဘဲ။ ခဏခဏဖြစ်နေတာတို့ အကို ကို တခြားနေရာမှာ လာနှောက်ယှက်နေတာတွေဖြစ်မှ ANI က တခုခုလုပ်မှာ။ တခြား wikiproject တွေမှာ နှစ်နဲ့ချီပြီး personal attack ခဏခဏလုပ်တဲ့ editor တွေကို ဘာမှအပြစ်မပေးခဲ့ဘူး။ ANI သွားရင်တောင် အလွန်ဆိုးမှ ban တို့ဘာတို့ လုပ်ပေးမှာ။ အများဆုံးလောက်က သူတို့ကို တောင်ပန်ခိုင်ရန်လောက်ဘဲရှိမှာ။ dispute resolution တို့ က policy နဲ့ပတ်သက်တဲ့ ပြဿနာတွေဘဲ ဖြေရှင်နိုင်မျာ။ အဲ့ဒါကြောင့် မေတ္တာပို့ပြီးစိတ်လျှော့လို့ ပြောတာ။ လာကိုက် ပြန်ကိုက်စရာမလိုဘူး။ အခုရက်ပိုင်တော့တိတ်မတွေတော့ပေမဲ့ လာကိုက်တဲ့လူကို user pageမှာ ငါး နဲ့သွားရိုက်လိုရတယ်။ EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

အမှန်ပြောရရင် တနေ့ တနေ့ ဒီအောက်တန်းစားတွေနဲ့ အငြင်းပွားနေရတာ မောလွန်းတယ်, Kyu Kyu Hlaမေ လုပ်သလို အချက်ကျကျ discuss တွေကို ကြိုဆို သဘောကျပေမဲ့, personal အရ ဘက်လိုက်ပြီး e.g Pencilo မှာ ဖြစ်သလိုမျိုး တဖတ်သတ် တွေကိုတော့ တကယ် သည်းမခံနိုင်ပါဘူး သူတို့ကတော့အလွယ်လေး ထည့်သွားတာ သူတို့ကို ပြန်ချေပဖို့ ရာ စာရေးရတာက ပိုအလုပ်ရှုပ်တယ်, ကိုယ်တွေက မတရားရင် Wikiမေ ခေတ်အဆက်ဆက် ပြသနာတွေပဲသွားရှာနေတော့ နေ့စဉ် စိန်ခေါ်မှုတွေပါပဲ...e.g သမိုင်းစာပေတွေကို Primacy source အဖြစ် သတ်မှတ်ဖို့လုပ်တာမျိုးဆို ဘယ်လ်ိုမှ လက်ခံလ်ို့မရဘူး ကိုးကားဖို့က ဒါတွေပဲရှိတာ ...ပီးတော့ ရှေ:ကျသူတွေက အချက်လက်များစွာရရှိဖို့ဆိုတာ အလွန်ရှားတယ် mention လောက်ပါရင်ကို အလွန်အရေးပါတဲ့သူလို့ သတ်မှတ်လို့ရတာ,

broလည်း ကျွမ်းကျင်နေတာ ဆောင်းပါးရေးဖို့ ပိုလုပ်သင့်တယ်, ကျွန်တော်ဆိုငလျင်တုန်းက ဘုရားပျက်တွေဘက် စိတ်ပါသွားပြီး ခုကြ ဘာမှမရေးချင်တော့ပြန်ဘူး,

လူတွေထက် သေပီးသား လူတွေအကြောင်းရေးရတာကြိုက်တယ် ရှင်တဲ့သူဆို updateရတာ မပီးတော့ဘူး, ပြီးတော့ ထူးဆန်းတဲ့ မြန်မာသမိုင်းထဲက အဖြစ်ပျက်မျိုးတွေ ရေးရတာ သဘောကျတယ်

အမြဲတမ်းပြသနာတတ်ရတာက Dykပဲ နားမလည်ပါးမလည် နဲ့ အရမ်းအကဲဖြတ်လွန်းတယ် ...

ပြီးတော့ ရင်းမြစ်တွေရှားပါးနေချိန်မှုာ reliability အတွက် အ ရမ်းအကဲမဖြစ်သင့်ဘူး case by caseနားလည်မှုနဲ့ သုံးရင်ပိုကောင်းမယ် ...e.g Global New Light ဆိုခု juntaစာစောငိမို့ အသူံးပြုရန်မသင့်ဟု ဆွေးနွေးနေကြပေမဲ့ လုံးဝကြီး မသုံးရတာတော့မဖြစ်သင့်ဘူး ဒါဆို ဟိုးအရင် အစိုးရ လက်ထက်ကဆောင်းပါးတွေပါ refလုပ်လို့မရလိုဖြစ်သွားတယ်, အနုပညာရှင်သတင်းတွေအတွက်ဆ်ို ဥပမာ ဘာဆုရတာ ဘာဘွဲ့ရတဲ့သတင်းတွေဆို GNLM ကတင်တယ် အဲ့လို နိုင်ငံရေး နဲ့မဆိုင်တာတွေဆို အသုံးပြုခွင့်ရသင့်တယ် imo

လောလောဆယ်တော့ ဒီလောက်ပဲ ဆွေးနွေးချင်တယ် နောက် ရှိလာမှ လာဆွေးနွေးပါဦးမေ Hteiktinhein (talk) 09:48, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ဒါက en wiki ဘဲ။ မြန်မာစာ wiki မှာဆိုရင် ပိုနာလည်တတ်တယ်။ အနောက်ပိုင်းနိုင်ငံတွေမှာ အချိန်ရှိလို့ဖြစ်ဖြစ် စာရွက်စာပေတွေအကုန်လုံး online ပေါ်သင်လို့ဖြစ်ဖြစ် သမိုင်းစာပေတဲမျာ အချက်လက်များစွာရှိတဲ့သူတွေက အများကြီးဘဲ dyk ဒို့ afd ဒို့ လုပ်တဲ့အချိန်မှာ တခြားနိုင်ငံက editor တွေက သူတို့သာမန် ရေးးတဲ့အကြောင်းအရာနဲ့ ကိုက်ညီအောင် reliability standard လိုက်နာမှာ။ ကျွန်တော်လဲ နာလည်ပါတယ်။ မြန်မာပြည်အကြောင်း သမိုင်း ပထဝီ ယဉ်ကျေးမှု အကြောင်း အားလုံးက facebook youtube မှာဘဲဖော်ပြထားတာရှိတာ။ အားလုံး သိပြီးသားအရာကို ဘယ်တက္ကသိုလ်က ပြန်ပြီး ပိုက်ဆံကုန်ပြီး ပုံနှိပ်ထုတ်ဝေမှာလဲ။ GNLM ကိစ္စကလဲ သက်ဆက်တယ်။ အခု စစ်ဖြစ်နေတုံး သတင်းစာတွေအားလုံးက စစ်ကိစ္စကို အဓိကထားနေပြီး၊ မဂ္ဂဇင်းတွေလဲ အလုပ်ပြုတ်စီးပွားရေးမကောင်းပြီး စစ်အစိုးရရဲ့ သတင်းစာတွေဘဲ ပြဿနာမရှိသလို ဒီလို ယဉ်ကျေးမှုဆိုင်ရာ သတင်းတွေကို ထုတ်ပြန့်တာများတယ်။ ကျနော်လဲ ထက်ရေးခြင်ဘာတယ်။ ဒါပေမဲ့ အချိန်မရှိတာတစ်ဘက် reliable source လုံလောက်အောင်မရှိတာကတစ်ဘက်။ EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:49, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

အကို ကျွန်တော်တော့ တော်တော် အာရုံနောက်နေပြီ အဲ့ အောက်တန်းစား တကောင်နဲ့ ခုထိမပြီးနိုင်သေးတာ အံ့ဩစရာပါ... ဒါတောင် AfD ထပ်ဖွင့်ဖို့လုပ်သေးတာနော် ... ကြည့်ရတာ ဒီဆောင်းပါးကို ဖျက်ချင်တာပဲသိတယ် ကျန်တာ ဘာမှ ခေါင်းထဲမထည့်ပုံပဲ 😂 မှန်းတာမမှားဘူးဆို အဲ့ ကုမ္မဏီကအလုပ်ဖြုတ်ခံလိုက်ရလို့ ခိုးငိုနေတဲ့ ကောင်ဆိုးလေးပဲဖြစ်မယ်, ဘယ်လိူပြောပြောမရတာ... AFDမေ ref လေးပဲ ရှာပေးလိုက်တာကို ခုထိ တိုက်ခိုက်လို့မပြီးသေးဘူး ...ဆောင်းပါးတွေရေးရင်း pingတွေ့လို့ တော်တော် ဒေါသထွက်သွားတယ်

သူဒီလောက် ဒီဟာက်ိုဖျက်ချင်ရင် သူများတွေ တင်ပြထားတဲ့ refတွေက ဘယ်လို ဖြစ်တယ် ဘာညာ ခုခံချေပလေ ခုကအဲ့လို လဲမလုပ် အကုန်လုံးကို ပတ်ရမ်းကားနေတာ တော်တော်ကိုဒေါသဖြစ်ရပါတယ်, သူ့လို ပါစက်နယ် မကျေနပ်တိုင်းသာ ဆောင်းပါးတွေပြသနာရှာရမေဆိုရင် မအလတို့ ပန်ဆယ်လို တို့ ဖျက်အနှောင့်ဝင်လုပ်တာကြာပြီပေါ့ ကိုယ့်မှာ ပါစင်နယ်ဘေးချထားလို့ ကိုယ်မုန်းတဲ့ မိကြူတို့ မိပန်တို့ ဆောင်းပါးတွေပါ စာအရှည်ကြီး ရေးပြီး ကာကွယ်ပေးနေရတယ် အောက်တန်းစား ဘက်လိုက်တဲ့ Vandalism ခွေးတွေလက်ကနေ

ကိုယ်တွေက အဲ့ထိုင်းဆောင်းပါးမေ ဘုတ်တင် တောင် ပီးစလွယ် auto ပူံစံပေးခဲ့တာတောင်မဟုတ်ဖူး သေချာချက်ကြ ဂျက်ကြကိုပေးခဲ့တာ ကိုယ်တွေ refတွေကြောင့် အရင် afdအဟောင်းက လက်မခံသူတွေပါ ကန့်ကွက်သူမရှိ ဆုံးဖြတ်ချက်ပြောင်းခဲ့တာ... မဲပေးသူက ကိုယ်တွေ မြန်မာ တွေပဲရှိတေဆ်ိူတောင် သူစွပ်စွဲတဲ့ စကနါ ဗီစာ ဆ်ိုတာ နည်းနည်းလက်ခံပေးလို့ရသေးတယ်😂 ခုက အရင်က လူတွေအကုန် လက်ခံ သဘောတူကြတာ... ဒီလောက်နဲ့ ပွဲပြီးပြီထင်တာ ခုကြည့်ဦး🫩

အကို ခုလို အကြီး အကဲအနေနဲ့ ဝင်ထောက်ပြပေးတာ ကျေးဇူးတင်ပါတယ် ဒါမှပဲ ပွဲက ပြီးမှာ ကိုယ့်မှာ သူ့ အခြေမြစ်မရှိတဲ့ပြောဆိုမှူတွေကိူ ဘယ်လိူ တုန့်ပြန်မလဲဆိုတာကို စဉ်းစားမရဘူး ကိုယ်ဘာပဲပြောပြော သူက သူလုပ်ချင်တာပဲလုပ်နေတာ...ကိုယ်တွေများ Visa လူလိမ်အဖွဲ့ တဲ့ ရယ်ရတာ😂 သူ့လို အလုပ်ထုတ်ခံရလို့ အောက်တန်းကျနေတဲ့ သူများမှတ်နေလားမသိ

တော်တော်ကို အသည်းယားတာ အောင့်ထားရတယ် ပွဲမကြီးချင်လို့...အက်ိုpolicy ဆန်ဆန် ဝင်actionယူမှ ဒီပွဲကထိန်းနိုင်တော့မှာ ... အခုက သက်သက်ကြီး သူ့ဘက်က မပီးနိုင်ဖြစ်နေတာ AfDကိုလည်း လက်မခံနိုင်ရှာဘူး တော်သေးတယ် ကိုယ်တွေမဲနဲ့ resultက ပိတ်သွားတာမဟုတ်လ်ို့ မဟုတ်ရင် fairမဖြစ်ဖူးဆိုပြီး ပြောဦးမယ် အခုက တခြားပါဝင်သူတွေ အရမ်းများတာကို တောင် အမှန်တရားလက်မခံပဲ အရှင်လပ်လပ် ပိta ဖြစ်နေရှာတာ

ကိုယ်တွေ တခါမှ အဲ့ဆောင်းပါး ဝင်မeditဖူးသလို visa pageတွေရှိတာတောင်မသိဖူးရယ်😂 ရေးလို့ရတာတောင် ခုမှသိတာ ပြီးတော့ ထိုင်းလို ယဉ်ကျေးမှူ သခိူးနိုင်ငံကို ဘာမှ ကာကွယ်ပေးစရာအကြောင်းလဲမရှိဘူး စိတ်တောင်မဝင်စားတာ

အခု နတ်တွေရေးနေရင်း pingတွေ့လို့ တော်တော် စိတ်တိုလာတာနဲ့ ဝင်ရေးလိုက်တာ အချက်ကျ ဂျက်ပျ အလင်းပြပေးမှပဲရတော့မယ်... အကိုလဲ မူမအမှန်တဲ့ လုပ်ဆောင်မှူတွေကို ဟန့်တား ပေးပါဦး ဥပမာ deletion tagကို တခြားeditorတွေ လက်မခံတဲ့ကြားက အကြိမ်ကြိမ်ဖယ်ဖို့လုပ်နေတာတွေ ဆောင်းပါးထဲက စာတွေ ဖယ်တာတွေ ကြည့်ရတာ လက်ရှော့မဲ့ပုံမရဘူး မြွေမသေဒုတ်မကျိုး ဒီလို အောက်တန်းစား ကြပ်မပြည့်တဲ့ userမျိူးနဲ့ အငြင်းပွားရတာ တော်တော် အကုသိုလ်ဖြစ်တယ် Hteiktinhein (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

အကိုရေ စိတ်လျှော့။ သူဘာလုပ်လုပ် ပေးလုပ်လဲဘာဖြစ်သွားမလဲ။ နောက် တစ်လ နှစ်လဆောင့်လိုက်ရင် ပြန် revert လုပ်ရင် သူမှတ်မိအုံးမလား။ ဒီ ကိစ္စက တကယ်ဆိုရင် ကျွန်တော်တို့နဲ့မဆိုင်ဘူး။ အရင်ပြဿနာဖြစ်နေတဲ့ နှစ်ယောက်ထဲက တစ်ယောက် COI Noticeboard မှာ scam လုပ်နေတယ်လို့သွားပြောရင်ပြော မဟုတ်ရင် ခံနေရတဲ့သူက WP:DISPUTE မှာ သွားတိုင်ရမှာ။ page protection တောင်းထားတာကောင်တယ်။ EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 17:24, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello EmeraldRange, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 07:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 07:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello EmeraldRange, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, KhantWiki (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy Holidays, EmeraldRange. May you and your family be surrounded by love, peace, success and happiness. KhantWiki (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year 2026, EmeraldRange! 🎆 May your days be filled with success, happiness and peace. Wishing you all the best.. Much love and respect from your WikiProject Myanmar senior companion and editor. KhantWiki (talk) 04:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]