User talk:Emmalgnd

This is Emmalgnd's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno Sánchez-Andrade Nuño (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article seems to have come from the Spanish language Wikipedia, minus the online sources. Spanish Wikipedia has different rules compared to English Wikipedia.

This article is very difficult to assess for notability and sources. Despite the fact that the subject was born in 1981, all the links are offline, with one exception, even though most of them seemingly should have online access. Though it is not a requirement to have online sources, offline sources can be used, nevertheless in terms of checking notability it becomes a detective job.

So have a look at WP:REFB and see if you can get online sources here.

Also from a notability point of view, WP:BASIC will apply, or possibly WP:ACADEMIC. In either case, the criteria needs to be backed by reliable sources. For BASIC that ideally means 3 profiles of the subject, covering their whole career, in depth and independent. So ideally 3 newspaper profiles but other methods may be acceptable. ACADEMIC has 8 criteria, with different source options.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruno Sánchez-Andrade Nuño and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 08:26, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emmalgnd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 08:26, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]