Wiki Article

User talk:Ericengle

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fact pattern (December 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kiteinthewind was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
While I have a rather elementary understanding of what "Fact Pattern" is after reading this, the article is really confusing to read. Efforts should be made to make the article easier to read. Afterall, we can assume that many of our readers on Wikipedia are not legally trained. In addition, more independent sources are required.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 22:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Ericengle, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 22:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fact pattern, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Using your self published book as a source

[edit]

Wikipedia doesn't use self published books as sources, see WP:RS. You especially should not add bookstore links to your own selfpublished books, see WP:REFSPAM, WP:COI, and WP:PAID. - MrOllie (talk) 03:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]