Tetrapropylammonium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A great source of references for procedures is Org Syn.: free, online, top quality, and meets WP:SECONDARY (super-important goal for references). doi 10.15227/orgsyn.006.0054 gives generic alkylmag bromide prep. Your draft redlinks to isopropylmagnesium bromide. "No one" uses that. The dominant reagent is isopropylmagnesium chloride (cheaper, better equiv wt) as can be confirmed by Org. Syn. also.--Smokefoot (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've mostly seen iPrMgCl as as the isopropyl equivalent in my own reading, but I'm not quite confident in understanding which Grignards use Cl vs Br predominantly; is it a question of the carbon-halogen bond strength during synthesis? Intuitively that would suggest that -MgCl Grignards are more energy-intensive to produce than -MgBr, but I'm sure there's factors in the finer details that I'm completely oblivious to. Either way, it's one of those things where my sense of "notability" wasn't sure which one to do; thanks for the tip. I've rephrased it to instead link to the chloride, as I think some note of (minimal) isomerism is still "worth having". Fishsicles (talk) 01:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well everyone would use chlorides if they could because chlorides are way, way cheaper than bromides. Anyway, iPrMgCl is a commercial transmetalation reagent. Use a Grignard to make a Grignard. You do what you want, but iPrMgCl is more notable as you can verify by Googling or CAS search. Best wishes, --Smokefoot (talk) 02:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Sodium tetrapropylborate has been made into an article now by Graeme Bartlett and thus, your sandbox is now completely redundant. Thus i am telling you to completely blank and remove all the contents of your sandbox now and make it an empty sandbox and also remove all corruption it now itself. 117.196.145.52 (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox was the original version of the draft; I hadn't blanked because I wasn't starting on anything new recently, and assumed that since it was my sandbox, nobody else would really be paying attention to it?

I wasn't aware users could submit other users' sandboxes. Fishsicles (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just got notifications about this again. It has been several months. You are block evading just to tell me to blank my sandbox, a page which should be no one's business but mine unless I'm actively submitting a draft, and moreover has already been blanked and repurposed for another draft and has been for - I reiterate - months. Please think about your priorities. Fishsicles (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. 117.252.158.50 (talk) 15:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Fishsicles! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alkylidene group, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pygos (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cupronickel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Nick. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fluoroantimonate, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Okayamalite, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anthropogenic mineral, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Titanosilicate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 17:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fishsicles. Thank you for your work on Titanosilicate. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I think you need to include the term "Titanium silicate" as that (e.g. TS-1) seems to be a common alternative. Miriam Webster also has silicotitanate.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Okayamalite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Anthropogenic mineral".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polyarylate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Dioyl dichloride has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5 § Dioyl dichloride until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 12:49, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hexafluoroaluminic acid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alkali fusion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2008 Institute, West Virginia explosion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You were kind enough to help out on Tsugaruite. If you don't mind, could you help me out a bit again? I'm working on a respected Thai woman chemist, Pramuan Tangboriboonrat, at User:MisawaSakura/Sandbox2. In the "research work" section the second and third paragraphs are hitting big in Earwig's tool. The second paragraph is just a list of positions she's held so I think it's ok. But the third paragraph, that talks about her work with rubber, etc, is too technical for me to dumb down and reword and I think too technical for the average reader. Could you work on this as you see appropriate? Feel free to edit the sandbox directly. If you're not interested, that's ok. Thanks for the time and consideration. MisawaSakura (talk) 22:33, 8 November 2025 (UTC)...I've asked at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red too. MisawaSakura (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not usually inclined to do WP:BLP edits- generally if something is the work of a specific researcher, it fails my notability criteria unless it's something that wins major international awards. (And frankly, even that's not always enough. This means you, spherical cow material.) I only have so much JSTOR access and am more focused on things than people from an encyclopaedia perspective. Fishsicles (talk) 14:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's fine. thanks for responding. I'll do what I can with it.MisawaSakura (talk) 14:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since it looks like she's won a national level prize, that should satisfy NPROF at least. I would caution against summarizing the science outside of details directly taken from secondary sources (like prize descriptions). Better a stub than an inaccurate representation of the science. Fishsicles (talk) 14:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just cut most of that third paragraph, ie, a skeleton summary. MisawaSakura (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fishsicles. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alkali fusion".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]