Wiki Article
User talk:Fróis
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
Concern regarding Draft:Busaidi–Mazrui conflicts
[edit]
Hello, Kolno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Busaidi–Mazrui conflicts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Transatlantic Persecutions of 1823
[edit] Hello, Kolno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Transatlantic Persecutions of 1823, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
[edit]
Fróis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I would like to appeal my block. I have taken the time to better understand Wikipedia's sourcing, especially by relying on modern, secondary academic sources instead of older, primary ones. While I have not yet gone back to fix my older drafts that used outdated sources, I have written a newer article, User:Kolno/Viking campaign in northern Portugal, which I believe follows Wikipedia's sourcing much more closely. I have also been working on another new draft (not yet published), and I can post it under User:Kolno if it would help show that I've applied the same sourcing there too. Thank you. Kolno (talk) 3:43 pm, 17 October 2025, last Friday (3 days ago) (UTC−7)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, see Toadspike's comment - this needs to be appealed at AN, not using the unblock template. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kolno (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Kolno. Since the block exists to enforce the result of this community discussion [1], you will have to appeal it at the WP:Administrators' noticeboard (per WP:UNBAN). I advise you to prepare carefully; an unsuccessful ban appeal will likely mean you will have to wait several months before being allowed to appeal again. Though your current appeal seems decent, the ANI discussion which resulted in this ban listed several issues beyond just using primary sources (which are sometimes allowed, see WP:PRIMARY). I recommend you read over that discussion and, in your unban request, briefly address each of your mistakes and how you have learned not to repeat them. I wish you all the best. Toadspike [Talk] 12:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Anzele
[edit] Hello, Kolno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Anzele, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Ivan Vladimirovich Putin, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Jailolo (1550)
[edit] Hello, Kolno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Jailolo (1550), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Tidorean–Portuguese conflicts
[edit] Hello, Kolno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tidorean–Portuguese conflicts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Annobón independence movement
[edit] Hello, Kolno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Annobón independence movement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Omani–Portuguese conflicts
[edit]
Hello, Kolno. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Omani–Portuguese conflicts".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ruy Germack Possolo
[edit] Hello, Kolno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruy Germack Possolo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Busaidi–Mazrui conflicts
[edit]Hello, Kolno. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Busaidi–Mazrui conflicts".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Donation of Bartolomeu has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Patre23 (talk) 13:19, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Transatlantic Persecutions of 1823
[edit]Hello, Kolno. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Transatlantic Persecutions of 1823".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Anzele
[edit]Hello, Kolno. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Siege of Anzele".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Viking campaign in northern Portugal has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rose Abrams (T C L) 10:16, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Portuguese raids in Senegambia has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Annobón independence movement
[edit]Hello, Kolno. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Annobón independence movement".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:25, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Safavid invasions of Basra has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Portuguese sack of Qeshm has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TheInevitables (talk) 02:55, 12 December 2025 (UTC)cropping and uncropping image in the article of Nuno Loureiro
[edit]Please see the discussion in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nuno_Loureiro#Argument_for_not_cropping_the_image Apandada1 (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Genoese East Indies expedition has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Genoese East Indies expedition has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jôhola 07:03, 28 December 2025 (UTC)30 September 1639 (redirect reverted)
[edit]I noticed you made the article 30 September 1639 into a redirect. I have reversed this for now. Please consider starting a merge discussion for this article. I can help you do this if you wish. If you don't believe any content can be merged, please consider an Articles for Deletion discussion. aaronneallucas (talk) 20:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Siege of Monção
[edit]Hello, Fróis
I edit here too, under the username Aplucas0703 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Siege of Monção, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 2 § Siege of Monção.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Aplucas0703}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
aaronneallucas (talk) 01:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Rui Freire de Andrada moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Rui Freire de Andrada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 03:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katagiri Sekishū, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibaraki. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Improvement
[edit]Hi, while your image shows him while being king, it's monochrome with oval shape, and it just doesn't look good to me. A lead image should be an image that represents the subject the best, which should be the best looking portrait and contemporary, if it was his time as king as well then that's just a bonus, this is a 17th century, you can't find portrait of him in every years, it's just a weird choice for me that you choose a monochrome portrait even though contemporary color portrait of him exists even if it showed his during his reign, this portrait shows him when he's an adult, contemporary, and just look better than the monochrome one. Alfdeckse (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please take this to the article's talk page so it can be discussed openly. Fróis (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2026 (UTC)