User talk:GeekBurst

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
7	Master of the Faculties (talk)	Add sources
67	Allders (talk)	Add sources
8	Coopers Square (talk)	Add sources
9	Portsmouth Pyramids Centre (talk)	Add sources
24	Southampton City Centre (talk)	Add sources
554	ITVX (talk)	Add sources
49	Water supply and sanitation in the United Kingdom (talk)	Cleanup
45	Ashdown House, East Sussex (talk)	Cleanup
4	Hetton Academy (talk)	Cleanup
124	Operation Atlantic Resolve (talk)	Expand
396	Russian foreign agent law (talk)	Expand
597	Tyne and Wear (talk)	Expand
37	Big W (United Kingdom) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
73	Sandton City (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
230	Racism in the United Kingdom (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
63	HMV Canada (talk)	Merge
1,504	Vietnamese đồng (talk)	Merge
27	Kid Paddle (talk)	Merge
4	James Hamilton Doggart (talk)	Wikify
10	Space Flight Europe-America 500 (talk)	Wikify
5	Castle Quay Shopping Centre (talk)	Wikify
9	2018 Leicester explosion (talk)	Orphan
5	Probation in Ukraine (talk)	Orphan
1	Cleveland Stance (talk)	Orphan
19	United States – Russia mutual detargeting (talk)	Stub
33	.tn (talk)	Stub
13	Pablo Miller (talk)	Stub
6	St George's and Priorslee (talk)	Stub
66	Brico Dépôt (talk)	Stub
26	Slayground (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind expaling

Why you reverted my block notice? Along with the instructions for requesting unblock?? Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:34, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, that was in error. I couldn't find the page to revert that back again. GeekBurst (talk) 00:44, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've gone ahead and reverted back the page to it's original state with your block notice, apologies once again. GeekBurst (talk) 00:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:54, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CSD

Hi GeekBurst! I wanted to let you know that I declined your CSD tags at Freetricity. The article is not beyond hope of repair for G11 (I see a distinct lack of promotional language), and having access to between $50 million and $700 million is a credible claim of significance. Best, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 18:44, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to G11, 2 of the links are from a promotional newspaper articles, and another is a company owned website advertising solar.

Specifically, half the Wiltshire Business Online article is a quote from the company owner, and the copyright for FreeHeating.net is Freetricity, and The Guardian articles comes across as promoting the launch of the company.

Argument could be made that the article lacks independent sources as opposed to being promotional, but I see little information that isn't boasting about the business. Many solar companies don't get their own article, but it appears Freetricity ended up with one due to the notability of the founder.

Unless there is a plan to improve this article, I'll tag it for a deletion discussion. GeekBurst (talk) 20:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not personally plan to improve the article, but it was certainly not a G11 case. Note that problems which can be fixed by editing will not go over well at AFD; the content is far from the place where WP:TNT applies. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 20:36, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution, but I have failed to yield any results for this company that aren't advertising, as another editor pointed out the Parliament link is just a reported submitted by the company, so it's not independent coverage.

If the consensus is to Keep, then perhaps someone who supported the article will be able to improve it sufficiently to prevent a future discussion. GeekBurst (talk) 20:39, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for ubx

It meets my goal. Took a bit of tinkering to make it work. DMc75771 (talk) 02:24, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]