User talk:Helkat4

This is Helkat4's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massimo Villata (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Everything must be sourced, no exceptions. In addition no bragging. I have marked a little then gave up as there is too much. He might be notable, but this draft is not good enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Massimo Villata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 03:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Helkat4! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 03:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I have revised the draft to remove subjective wording, ensured that all biographical statements are explicitly sourced with independent institutional references, and clarified the subject’s affiliation and role using third-party sources. I hope this addresses the concerns raised. Helkat4 (talk) 12:10, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massimo Villata (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sorry, but the sources need to verify specific statements in the sentences they go with. When I did some checking [3] is about the telescope not him; [4] does not verify that he worked as a research scientist until retirement; [5] is broken and [6] does not verify that he was President. I did not check further. Please ensure that every claim has a source that verifies it before you resubmit. Then check again please!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Massimo Villata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your patience. Please, see the revised version. I have a little problem with the citations for the affiliation with the Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino - Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), meaning I don't know which ones to use. References 3 and 4 (from Media INAF) that I cited cover a certain period (2015-2024), while reference 5 covers the entire period: 1995-2026, but it's the list of peer-reviewed publications extracted from the Astrophysics Data System (where you can access all papers, which show the affiliation), and I'm not sure if it's appropriate. Several other articles on Media INAF (not cited) also show the affiliation, in addition to references 1, 2, 6, 7, 16, 17, and 18, which I cited elsewhere for other reasons. Any suggestions? Thanks again. Helkat4 (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2026 (UTC) Helkat4 (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]