Hello and thank you for visiting!

The article on Pahlad Ramsurrun is now published. I welcome constructive feedback, suggestions, or corrections to help keep the article accurate and informative. I’m always happy to collaborate with fellow editors to improve the content.

Thank you for your interest!

Warm regards, – ICNTsurfer

Hi, the dodo was a single species, the dinosaurs were an entire group of animals with thousands of species. Each species of dinosaur also only lived in limited areas, not all over the world. For example, some only lived on Madagascar, etc. FunkMonk (talk) 17:37, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that pages in your personal user sandbox are not allowed to be filed in categories, per WP:USERNOCAT. Do not readd User:ICNTsurfer/sandbox to categories again, because it isn't allowed to be in categories. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 13:33, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I'm now in the picture. I will not do so again. ICNTsurfer (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

I have tagged three of the images in this draft for deletion from Commons as of questionable provenance, because they are described as Own Work, but are described as having been taken between 1949 and 1982. I also have doubts about the text of this draft. I am declining this draft, pending further investigation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pahlad Ramsurrun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:55, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ICNTsurfer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:55, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert McClenon, thanks for your feedback. As a first time article writer on Wikipedia (at draft level), I'm willing to learn. Please let me know whether I have to manually remove the photos in question. I would also like to receive some feedback how to improve my text or what to avoid. Many thanks! ICNTsurfer (talk) 22:50, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pahlad Ramsurrun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 21:34, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Qcne,

I just wanted to sincerely thank you for all the guidance, tips, ideas, and encouragement you provided during the creation of my brother’s article. Your support was invaluable, and I truly appreciate the time you took to help me navigate the process.

This project has been a good learning experience for me, and your advice made a real difference in helping the article reach B-Class status and be moved to the main namespace. I am very grateful for your kind assistance and encouragement throughout.

I hope to continue learning from editors like you and contribute more effectively in the future.

Thank you once again! ICNTsurfer (talk) 16:38, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words. :) qcne (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Below are older messages from July 2025 regarding my initial edits on Wikipedia. These warnings reflect early mistakes I made while learning to edit. I have acknowledged them and adjusted my editing practices accordingly. They are preserved here for reference and transparency.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 11:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry VIII. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 11:12, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense 🌈 论 11:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again. No, I don't have any content dispute. Just trying to learn editing. But I understand that as a learner I can commit mistake. Please bear with me, I will be cautious next time. ICNTsurfer (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Richard III of England. Remsense 🌈 论 11:37, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the error. I'm new to the working of Wikipedia. Still learning. Will do my best not to commit mistake. Thanks for your kind understanding. ICNTsurfer (talk) 11:43, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not realise it was a mistake. I'll be cautious next time. Thanks for your patience and kind understanding, as I'm still "learning the ropes." 82.6.90.86 (talk) 12:48, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]