User talk:ItsSmartMe

Welcome!

Hi ItsSmartMe! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm KatnissEverdeen. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mikaal Zulfiqar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 14:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already the teaser and title song is released on youtube with full cast ItsSmartMe (talk) 15:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ItsSmartMe, thank you for your contributions. I just noticed that you added a film and a series for Maya Ali, and a box office figure for Love Guru (2025 film), but you did not provide any reliable sources for these changes. Although, you are most welcome to make your helpful edits, but the important thing to note is that Wikipedia is itself a tertiary source of information which requires independent secondary references, and that should be free of copyright violations and predictions. Similarly, IMDb is also a tertiary source, and cannot be used as a reference on Wikipedia. Furthermore, according to the biography policies, any unsourced or poor claim is highly subjected to be removed. To note, I have currently undid your edit assuming good faith, thank you! M. Billoo 16:23, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nameer Khan (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NACTOR, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nameer Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ItsSmartMe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nameer Khan (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Early life and education is completely unsourced. Please add reliable and independent references to the subject to verify the content in a draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nameer Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 01:48, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nameer Khan (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nameer Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nameer Khan (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nameer Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ayesha Omar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Iqra Aziz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:27, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hira Mani, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. You must include a reliable source that supports your edits. Ravensfire (talk) 03:31, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kubra Khan, you may be blocked from editing. Seriously, you NEED to read these warnings and start to use sources. There's information in the warnings above about how to do this. You WILL end up blocked from editing if you continue to add information without sources. Please stop. Ravensfire (talk) 16:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir I have noted your concern. But why are some of my changes that are valid are being erased after some time like page of Javed Sheikh? Further more I will try to add sources to my edits. ItsSmartMe (talk) 08:47, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Too much was unsourced and given the number of bad edits you've made and the utter lack of response from you until this, it's not worth anyone else's time to clean up after your edits. Yes, some articles are bad about having sources and many articles are some unsourced information in them. The idea is to not make the problem worse, which is why nearly all of your edits have been reverted so far. Ravensfire (talk) 14:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will make sure I give sources whenever I make edits. But since pakistani dramas are aired on youtube what can I give source or references for that particular drama? And I hope my edits further will not be erased. ItsSmartMe (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If your edits don't include good sources, they will continue to be removed. Articles in reputable newspapers and websites - NOT blogs, scraper sites, forums, etc. Avoid gossipy / tabloid style sites. This is how readers can verify that the information is correct. (see WP:V) Ravensfire (talk) 17:50, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir, thank you and I hope my edits further will not be erased. ItsSmartMe (talk) 15:14, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Aijaz Aslam. Ravensfire (talk) 04:43, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the source from the official website. ItsSmartMe (talk) 04:51, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You did not in multiple articles. You need to include a source (or sources) that supports everything you add to an article. Ravensfire (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok done sir, I will make changes in all those articles ItsSmartMe (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for using sources! It's appreciated. Ravensfire (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your most Welcome. Also thank you for guiding me ItsSmartMe (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ali Ansari (actor), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 06:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Faysal Quraishi. Despite the previous warnings, you continue to use unreliable sources. No more warnings will be given. CNMall41 (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Maya Ali. CNMall41 (talk) 18:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bilal Ashraf. CNMall41 (talk) 18:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Maya Ali

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maya Ali, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Bilal Ashraf

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bilal Ashraf, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Jay8g [V•T•E] 23:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lux Style Awards, you may be blocked from editing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 21:52, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Emmad Irfani, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 07:32, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sanam Saeed. FINAL WARNING. You continue to add unreliable sources despite dozens of warnings. CNMall41 (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All the edits made by me are 100% right, also I have added the right resources. And also in the awards section I just arranged it in a beautiful manner. I should be telling this that if you keep on removing my edits like this I will stop contributing. These edits made by me are mostly related to Pakistani film industry and yes as a small country having small audience and viewers, resources to all of these are also limited. It's a humble request if you can revert my work because it looked much more organised. ItsSmartMe (talk) 10:46, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was reverted because the sources you used are unreliable. Feel free to discuss on the talk pages of those articles but do not edit war. You have been warned many, many, many, many, many times. If you introduce another unreliable source, you will be reported and likely blocked. See WP:CIR. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These sources are reliable I have used imdb links and links from websites which actually post right content. And I am sure they are not false. As I already mentioned above this is the pakistani film industry they don't have big media coverage or any thing like they have small audiences and so small mediums for coverage. The only thing you can do now is trust me because I have really followed websites for long and they are never wrong. Also these pakistani shows are launched on YouTube, where you can actually cross check.

I want just request you, that just trust me, any of my edits are never wrong and never will be. ItsSmartMe (talk) 19:03, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not about "trust," it is about "verification." Do not use this or other unreliable sources. Again, you will be reported should it happen again. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will try to collect as much as resources I can for that particular edit I do. ItsSmartMe (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it is about the reliability of the sources (see WP:RS). Adding "much" is not going to do it. I would suggest that until you have the competency to understand what qualifies as a reliable source, use the talk page of any article you want to add sources to. Discuss there and get consensus until you become more familiar. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Sanam Saeed. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. I do not known what to say at this point. Despite dozens of warning about adding unreliable sourcing, you are now edit warring to put those sources back into pages. At this point, you will need to be reported at ANI if it happens again. Again, not sure what else to do at this point. CNMall41 (talk) 08:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ItsSmartMe (talk) 08:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But can I exactly know which of those edits were wrong?? ItsSmartMe (talk) 08:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is not a reliable source. Brides and You??? Definitely not a reliable source. Reviewit is not reliable and lucky to not be blacklisted. These are just a few. Not to mention you need to stay away from unyblined churnalism similar to WP:NEWSORGINDIA. You have been told this previously however. You were also told to use the talk page of that article if you feel the sources removed are reliable. You didn't, you edit warred instead. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll make sure you don't add resources from these sites anymore. ItsSmartMe (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But in the wikipage of Durefishan Saleem reviewit.pk has been used and approved ItsSmartMe (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See [[WPOTHERSTUFF]. I will not waste additional time explaining. Use the talk page if you feel it should be added (third time saying such). --CNMall41 (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kubra Khan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kubra Khan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the citation which was of wikipedia. Thank you ItsSmartMe (talk) 06:10, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Farhat Ishtiaq

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Farhat Ishtiaq, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FUCHSIA Awards

This is a non-notable award from a spam website. Please do not add it to biographies. CNMall41 (talk) 18:14, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, actually I saw it in some other actors biographies and thought that it is valid. ItsSmartMe (talk) 06:43, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I removed those at the same time as the above notification. Unless the award is notable (meaning, has its own Wikipedia page), we do not include them in award sections. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I make the wikipedia page for it?? It is digital magazine which has started its award section in 2024 having its own two youtube channels where it was announced. If you ask me to do so, I can make one page for it ItsSmartMe (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have to be joking. You already know the answer. There was one previously and it was deleted. It is not notable and it is also an unreliable source. I would recommend removing it as a source for anywhere here in Wikipedia as it is something a few of us have already slowly been doing. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:43, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine, I will try to avoid it. ItsSmartMe (talk) 05:44, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fushcia Magazine moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fushcia Magazine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because its not notable and its also an unreliable source . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks ItsSmartMe (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Fushcia Magazine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Fushcia Magazine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MCE89 (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hareem Farooq, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Again, not sure what to do but this is the final warning. You are again introducting reliable soruces such as "Brides and You." You have been warned, acknowledged, but still continue. At this point, it seems like vandalism or a WP:CIR issue. Please stop or this will have to go to WP:ANI. CNMall41 (talk) 06:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'll make sure to give proper and reliable sources ItsSmartMe (talk) 07:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kubra Khan. CNMall41 (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And again with this edit which adds an unsourced 2026 entry to a filmography despite it still being 2025. You have now also been made WP:AWARE that biographies of living people are a contentious topic in a notice below. Stop adding unsourced content, it's likely that you will not be warned again, but will instead be reported and subsequently sanctioned. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Kubra Khan. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 17:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No the changes I made now are totally different than the previous ones. ItsSmartMe (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 16:29, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

23rd Lux Style Awards moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 23rd Lux Style Awards. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the individual year is not notable. In fact, many of them are not and should go AfD. For this one, you only cite one source which is also unreliable. . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 23rd Lux Style Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 23rd Lux Style Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/23rd Lux Style Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this is the page of a award ceremony of the film and television industry of Pakistan. Which is held every year after year in a offline mode. But this year due to the Pahalgham attack that is conflicts between Pakistan and India this was held in online digital platform, nut the voting was as usual and the awardees were awarded with the awards and this was put on YouTube and Instagram. That's the reason for lack of citation unlike previous ones. But I have followed the previous formats and done a very ordered good wikipedia page since the upcoming award show is today 11 Dec. So I would like request you all to please take this into consideration as all what I have written is true and the YouTube videos of the ceremony is also attached in the External links section. ItsSmartMe (talk) 05:42, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 23rd Lux Style Awards (December 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sent to mainspace by OP with same content. Now at AfD.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

24th Lux Style Awards moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 24th Lux Style Awards. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Not notable. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators Notice Board

Unfortunately, I believe this is a WP:CIR issue. You just created the page 24th Lux Style Awards with a single unreliable source despite the 23rd Lux Style Awards being up for deletion as not being notable. You continue to add unreliable sources and unsourced information to pages despite warnings and promising not to do so in the future. Yet, it keeps happening. I beg of you to stop this type of disruptive editing as you have already been given many "final warnings." This one is the last. Next time you will have to be reported to WP:ANI. CNMall41 (talk) 05:20, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025 (2)

You have been blocked indefinitely from moving pages and creating new pages for repeatedly creating copy and paste copies of rejected drafts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:04, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But I did not copy paste it, I actually added two more sources to it, made changes and then published it. By the way, it is a award show page so only what it contains is the nominees and winners for which I think these sources are quite enough. Also, I have followed the exact format as the before ones. Thank you, hopefully I will be unblocked. ItsSmartMe (talk) 18:18, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 24th Lux Style Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 24th Lux Style Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24th Lux Style Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 02:47, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ameer Gilani

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ameer Gilani, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:48, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Naeema Butt

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Naeema Butt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:09, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sajal Aly

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sajal Aly, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will look into it ItsSmartMe (talk) 06:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Haris Waheed

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Haris Waheed, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:06, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Mawra Hocane

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mawra Hocane, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Mahira Khan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mahira Khan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dananeer Mobeen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Diff: Special:Diff/1330902384. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Dananeer Mobeen, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Section headings should be in sentence case, please see MOS:HEADINGS and MOS:SENTENCECASE. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ItsSmartMe! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Kubra Khan. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Kubra Khan, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. The image has been objected to. Use the talk page per WP:ONUS but do not edit war.. CNMall41 (talk) 04:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ItsSmartMe (talk) 05:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Armeena Khan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Armeena Khan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:01, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]