User talk:J121233

Welcome!

Hello, J121233, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources. Articles must be written in a neutral manner and may not contain AI generated material.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – for contributing to other articles. Writing a new article is tough, so getting experience elsewhere is useful.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 09:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello C.Fred,

Will my article be kept on or deleted? I contested it and continued editing it, but nothing has happened for around an hour.

Thanks. J121233 (talk) 09:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that nothing has happened means it isn't so obvious a case as to be deleted outright. Further, since you've continued working on the article, I'm waiting to see if there is something about him that clears the significant/important hurdle. —C.Fred (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Everyone!

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Carder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joshua Carder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Epsilon.Prota ^talk 08:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Limeburners Bay, Hobsonville moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Limeburners Bay, Hobsonville. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Needs secondary coverage. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Also, please know that you can only publish a draft after it is completed. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 11:16, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hobsonville

I've noticed the drafts you created -- I believe these are unlikely to be accepted as a stand alone page due to the notability criteria Wikipedia has. I'd recommend working on expanding the Hobsonville article with this content, to the point where the Hobsonville article gets large enough to justify a split, for example geography of Hobsonville or history of Hobsonville, much like we have geography of New Zealand and history of Auckland as the main article would be too large to cover it all.

verifiability is also important and sources need to be published and reliable, which websites such as the Hobsonville Church do not meet, although the Heritage New Zealand report on the Hobsonville Church is a good source (albeit one error they still have yet to correct).

There are a lot of good reliable sources on Hobsonville at the Heritage New Zealand archaeological library and I would be happy to help you out with work on this.

You said you have a conflict of interest too, are you a descendant of one of the settlers? I honestly wouldn't consider it a COI after more than 4 generations as you would never have personally known the person and gain little to benefit personally. Considering we have people writing about their employers... Traumnovelle (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not related to anyone, I just live in the general area of it. Also, I would kindly accept some help because I've only been properly editing on Wikipedia for like a week. Thank you. J121233 (talk) 00:39, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't a conflict of interest, unless you're editing in a way to improve your property value. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand

Welcome / nau mai

Kia ora, hello, kia orana, nǐ hǎo, talofa lava, bula vinaka, guten Tag, hola, malo e leilei, fakalofa atu, namaste, salâm, see tahay. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

As a contributor to New Zealand articles, you may like to connect with other Kiwi Wikipedians through the New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject New Zealand and associated sub-projects.

Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand (WANZ), is recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation as the local chapter. WANZ receives funding from the Foundation and provides grants to support the movement in New Zealand. It organises editor training workshops, meetups, conferences and other events. If you would like to know more, follow WANZ on social media, email info@wikimedia.nz, or visit wikimedia.nz.

If you are living in New Zealand and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Here are some links you may find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
Until you've read about minor edits, never mark your edits as minor
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page, visit our friendly hosts in the Teahouse, or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! J121233 (talk) 07:26, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi J121233. Thank you for your work on 5 Pfennigs, Type 2 – Small Shield (1915–1922). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:GNG. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:56, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei:

Would coin catalogs with the coin in it make it more notable? There are reference links on Numista with German books and coin catalogs mentioning/explaining it. I'm trying to find more sources mentioning it. J121233 (talk) 22:03, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing to me. If the coin catalogs contained WP:SIGCOV about the coins (not just a passing mention), that should be ok. Have a great day! Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 09:16, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying.

I have the names of the books that include these specific coins, but I don't have the actual books to confirm it. I don't know how to fix this problem, as each of those books cost around $100 NZD. J121233 (talk) 09:20, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OHH justin Wim-Lim (talk) 09:46, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

where the naughty meter Wim-Lim (talk) 09:46, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ur in the talk page

scroll up and click the User Page. J121233 (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Badminton North Harbour (New Zealand)

The article Badminton North Harbour (New Zealand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Totally fails WP:NBAD.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello J121233! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]