Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:36, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote this my self. I did previously use grammarly for word choice. However I have restarted from the version prior to that and made my own word choices. Can you please review the page. I have put a lot of effort into this. Everything has been cited from credible sources and is in a neutral tone. ({{Ping|Pythoncoder}}),
I am not sure if I am doing this right lmao. Leventdev (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Leventdev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:36, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote this my self. I did previously use grammarly for word choice. However I have restarted from the version prior to that and made my own word choices. Can you please review the page. I have put a lot of effort into this. Everything has been cited from credible sources and is in a neutral tone. Leventdev (talk) 22:30, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Presidential System and Its Applicability in Turkey. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HurricaneZeta were:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HurricaneZetaC 16:07, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]