User talk:M4344459

Welcome!

Hi M4344459! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 23:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warm welcome! Appreciate it. M4344459 (talk) 23:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Hello, I'm MrOllie. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Note in particular that blogs, small business websites, and other forms of self published content are not reliable sources. MrOllie (talk) 03:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie,

Thank you for the message. I noticed you reverted my contributions across several different articles.

I want to clarify that these edits were not intended as spam; they were manual updates regarding specific regulatory changes and technical details. I cited different industry experts for each to support these specific claims.

However, I understand that Wikipedia prefers secondary sources over expert blogs or business websites due to WP:RS guidelines.

If I replace the citations with official government sources (e.g., the Federal Register, USCIS.gov, or Department of Labor publications) or mainstream legal journals to support the same text, would that resolve the issue? I want to ensure the articles reflect the most current regulations.

Best Regards M4344459 (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]