Wiki Article

User talk:MaD70

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Merge discussion for Natural farming

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Natural farming, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Nirvana2013 (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2012 (UTC) Nirvana2013 (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Semmle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page QUEL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, MaD70. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MaD70. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MaD70. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fun Is Beautiful, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commune. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CMMN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Case management.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The wikilink you restored is a redirect to the Occam page. See [1]. Do not create circular links. If we had a page about the XC Programming language, then of course we could have a link to it. But we don't, and so we can't. We could delete the redirect and create a red link perhaps, but we can't create a blue link that is circular to the page it is being linked from. That does no one any good. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Of course there is a XC Programming Language page, I haven't noticed that someone had put a redirect in place of a valid page. MaD70 (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect point to the correct article now. MaD70 (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the article you just wrote, yes. Is that all your own work? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see that you actually expanded the article before you tried your revert, but the link you added to the Occam page was to XC programming language and you had expanded XC Programming Language. Thus the link you reverted was still a redirect, but you have just spotted that and redirected the title you had (with correct capitalisation) to the one you expanded (with wrong capitalisation - See MOS:CAPS). So at least we are all now looking at the same thing - but I think that page has some severe issues. We can discuss those at the article talk page though. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Damn, they put a redirect on talk page too! MaD70 (talk) 22:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, you updated it now to link to the correct page. MaD70 (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded the original article with information from various web sources (for example this was useful), guided by what I remember of CSP, Occam and XMOS hardware. It's just a draft, I'm thinking how to add more references. MaD70 (talk) 22:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Right, but that came from here: [2] - and the redirect was created in 2020. Note that the article, with history, is therefore at XC (programming_language), and where you have the new article is the wrong location. To preserve attribution, if we keep the article, we'll now need a history merge, as well as a page move. This will need administrator attention. Before requesting that, I am considering taking it to AfD for the discussion as to whether we should have the article at all. There is no point requesting a complicated history merge if we are not keeping the article. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I have no experience with how these processes are handled on Wikipedia; I only contribute occasionally. Frankly, the only reason I even bothered to expand the article was because I thought it had already passed the notability filter, given that it's been around since 2013. But evidently, that was because the various redirects left it under the radar. MaD70 (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oh the current page of this link you mentioned is another redirect! I give up, I cannot confront this mess. MaD70 (talk) 23:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not to worry. I don't want to get it summarily deleted. The redirects were made because it was not considered notable, but I don't see any discussion to that effect, so if we go to AfD it will be for a hopefully amicable discussion of sourcing. But there are quite a few research papers. I've pinged in Dbeef on the talk page who has a good knowledge of programming languages, I believe. They are an administrator so if we are all in agreement its worth sorting out, they'll be able to do that (or get someone who can do the history merge). It's a bit borderline because really the language is only of fairly narrow interest - but still, it can be notable in a narrow field. I'll leave it there for now. Dbeef can hopefully add a third perspective when they see the ping. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I should explain the history merge, as you may not have seen these before. It is the edit history of who wrote what on the former article. Under the terms of the Wikipedia license, there should be attribution for all the edit history, so your edits and the edits of the people back before 2020 all need to be there in the article history. The stuff you added today was based on the stuff that was there before 2020, so we should attribute the original author, but also you as the one who put it back. So all the history should be merged into the one primary article. I hope that makes sense. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]