Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Your recent editing history at Hurricane Melissa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a ton of SWIO tracks I've been working on this week that I will get uploaded tomorrow and Sunday. Noah, BSBA^Talk 04:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Hurricane Maria. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. FourNoddlers (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to 2025 Atlantic hurricane season. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Jasper Deng (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MarioProtIV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Fifty-Six–Larkin tornado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page is now excessively long. You should set up archiving. Let any of us know if you need help doing so. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mario, ignoring this message, and countless others, is not appreciated, and this pattern has continued despite your having had years since the last time I called you out on this. This is not acceptable. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:43, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly I’ve been pretty lazy not having archived this sooner lmao. I would always have the thought then ended up forgetting about it. I’ll set up archiving either tonight or tomorrow because 300 sections on my talk page does not bode well at all.

edit: saw that recent message as I typed this out and yeah I’ve had a bad habit of doing that which isn’t healthy. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:45, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With that idea in mind I manually archived up to last month. Tedious yes, and I am gonna have to get a bot to do that going forward most likely, so I will definitely reach out to you guys soon regarding auto-archiving by bots since I haven't really done that yet. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:57, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got you, will do that then. DartsF4 (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Not worth spending energy on them when the very fabric of their "supposed" request comes from a deprecated fake news source. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 20:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]