User talk:NeuroJasper

Your thread has been archived

Hi NeuroJasper! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why is my Talk Page post in italics?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, NeuroJasper! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! lp0 on fire () 19:11, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much -- for both the delicious cookies, and the warm welcome! NeuroJasper (talk) 00:42, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! If you have any questions about editing, please feel free to ask :) lp0 on fire () 08:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please note that as you are not extended confirmed, you are only permitted to make non controversial edit requests within the topic area. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 07:15, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thank you! I was not aware that extended confirmed restrictions also applied to comments on requested move discussions. Good to know. :) NeuroJasper (talk) 07:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]