Welcome to Wallyfromdilbert's talk page

You can leave me a message by clicking here to start a new section. Please sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your message. If you want to have a discussion about article content, please put your comment on that article's talk page, so that other editors are aware of the discussion. If I have not responded to a discussion, please ping me there or let me know here. Sometimes I am unexpectedly busy, and I may not have time to respond for several months.

Important policies to know: Verifiability | No original research | Neutral point of view | Assume good faith

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Hi Notwally! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Bearian (talk) 05:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that YouTube was a deprecated source, and we should avoid primary sources unless absolutely necessary. It's really something that belongs in the "External Links" section. Bearian (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian, I agree. I mistakenly undid your edit, but now I removed that content that was sourced to the Youtube video. – notwally (talk) 05:36, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Again, YouTube belongs in External links like the subject's website. Bearian (talk) 07:53, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Notwally - hope you're well. Wondering if, whenever you get a chance, you could let me know if you have any edits/additions to what I've just added to Ralph DeLuca? I added some content based off an article I found from December 2024. Thank you in advance if you have time! Meeeems (talk) 17:14, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meeeems, those looks like some great improvements you made. – notwally (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI I'm not purposefully inserting my comments ahead of others, thats an artifact of the way I tend to edit in which I will have a tab open for a very long time (I'm mostly doing other things, just editing when I have a moment or two). This means that if an edit is made in the interim at the same level but doesn't conflict the system will automatically put my comment first even though it has a later timestamp because the ticket was opened first. This is rather common and you will see it across most heavily trafficked wiki discussions, please assume good faith. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Has nothing to do with good faith. If you are leaving your tabs open for a long time, then you need to be checking them to make sure you are not messing up ongoing discussions. – notwally (talk) 22:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article JT Tran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

General lack of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GarethBaloney 20:23, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It may seem random for me to tell you about this article considering all you have is one revert on it but most of the contributors for JT Tran's article are blocked. Not a good look. GarethBaloney 20:25, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notwally, I work with Howard Milstein. I see that you added a COI tag to his page several months ago. The article has since been cleaned up significantly, and last month I requested on the Talk page that the tag be removed. I appreciate your contributions to the page, and I hope you'll consider removing the tag. You can see my edit request here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Howard_Milstein#Tag_removal. Thank you, SmilingForest (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Brian K Horton indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 03:27, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Notwally. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 7 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a happy 2026 ahead. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:27, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]