User talk:Panda2024

January 2024

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Recognition of same-sex unions in India—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 07:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi Panda2024! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Recognition of same-sex unions in Israel several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in Israel, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you recently removed content from Same-sex marriage in North Carolina without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wiiformii (talk) 21:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary based on what?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Israel&oldid=prev&diff=1228279412

how did you determine whether the anchor was unnecessary?

MWQs (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sagi Golan is hardly a notable person. Panda2024 (talk) 19:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There no notability criteria on an anchor? Almost the opposite, if he was a notable person he'd have his own page and not need an anchor on the short paragraph referring to him. MWQs (talk) 19:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove anchors without consulting the editor who added them, they are needed to direct incoming links to the right part of the page. MWQs (talk) 21:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got three other editors above giving you feedback on changes they didn't think were constructive. If you repeatedly make changes that break things you risk getting blocked from editing. MWQs (talk) 21:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Panda2024 why do you want it removed!? MWQs (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see what's confusing now, you can remove the link from his name, the square brackets, I'm not sure why that's there. But please put back the anchor template. It links from OTHER pages. MWQs (talk) 20:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recognition of same-sex unions in Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikkei. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sweden Yearly Meeting

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sweden Yearly Meeting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sweden Yearly Meeting

The article Sweden Yearly Meeting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability (nor any claim to it as far as I can see), lacks independent indepth reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WMLGBT Community Meeting April 2025

Hi there! I hope this message finds you well. I'd like extend an invitation to you to join the upcoming Wikimedia LGBT+ online Community Meeting. We will be discussing, among other topics, the 2025 edition of the Wiki Loves Pride global campaign and how to collaborate better across languages on queer-related articles. You can register and find more information about it on: meta:WMLGBT Community Meeting April 2025.--Freddy eduardo (talk) 14:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same sex marriage in Sint Maarten.

Hey, sorry if I came off a bit harsh in my last edit.

I hope the following will not come off nitpicky, but I believe there has been another slight error in the page regarding the source from Daily Herald you used.

Where in the text (see reference for 6 b) it mentions facilities and equal treatment (Somewhere between line 71 and 75) “However, acceptance and …only to heterosexual couples” “When a facility, … based on non-discrimination rules.” The text makes several claims. None of these can be found in the daily herald article (reference 6, name=“sintmaarten”)

On top of this, and this is in no way criticism of your edits, I think I will add some language like “but this may be legalised in the future” as the other source you’ve added (76crimes) mentions ‘but that’s likely just a court challenge away’.

Thank you for your work. Slomo666 (talk) 15:41, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

Excellent work. I assessed this as B-Class. Bearian (talk) 20:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Same-sex marriage in New Hampshire

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Same-sex marriage in New Hampshire, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:22, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Panda2024! Your additions to Same-sex marriage in Georgia (U.S. state) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Dear Panda2018, please avoid ad-hominems and stop attacking other editors, as you did here. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing, just like others who were arrogant and biased toward me. Thank you, bye. Cyanmax (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

Hello, I'm Kvinnen. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Recognition of same-sex unions in Tamil Nadu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kvinnen (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]