User talk:PeeJay

This is PeeJay's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33: 21 days

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
10	Big Flame (band) (talk)	Add sources
42	Section 25 (band) (talk)	Add sources
56	2025–26 Rugby Europe Trophy (talk)	Add sources
542	Hull F.C. (talk)	Add sources
259	Leigh Leopards (talk)	Add sources
117	Swinton Lions (talk)	Add sources
287	King Power Stadium (talk)	Cleanup
614	Sam Kerr (talk)	Cleanup
2	1991 Campeonato Argentino de Rugby (talk)	Cleanup
1,594	Pro Bowl (talk)	Expand
1,059	Millennium Stadium (talk)	Expand
519	Dancing with the Stars (Irish TV series) (talk)	Expand
2,169	Old Trafford (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
46	Wollongong Showground (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
281	2008–09 NFL playoffs (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
32	Bega Dairy & Drinks (talk)	Merge
6	Equulites klunzingeri (talk)	Merge
94	Anuradhapura kingdom (talk)	Merge
419	Elland Road (talk)	Wikify
25	1980–81 Football League Cup (talk)	Wikify
11	Claremont, Johannesburg (talk)	Wikify
2	Antonio París Sanz de Santamaría (talk)	Orphan
2	Balagrus (talk)	Orphan
2	Colla Jean McDonald (talk)	Orphan
5,936	Canada women's national ice hockey team (talk)	Stub
19	1987–88 Chelsea F.C. season (talk)	Stub
15	Jake Bibby (talk)	Stub
18	Hilton Park (stadium) (talk)	Stub
28	Lungs as food (talk)	Stub
23	Ambert (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:48, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

An editor with your level of experience knows better than to get into an edit war. Per WP:BRD, you made a bold move, were reverted, and the next step was to discuss, not restore the version that you believe is correct. So, besides the disagreement on the name of the website being "Pro-Football-Reference" or "Pro Football Reference", would you please let me know which of my other edits you don't agree with? Assadzadeh (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I fixed the date formats for one, and I unified the formatting of the references. If you'd care to unify them in some other way, you're welcome to do so. My only intent was to make them consistent based on my interpretation of guidelines. – Pee Jay 23:07, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you don't need to fix date formats, because the {{Use mdy dates}} template at the top of the page does that automatically. For example, if the date of the source is "2026-01-02", then the template converts it to "January 2, 2026", whereas if the template was {{Use dmy dates}}, then it would be converted to "2 January 2026". As for unifying the formatting of the references, I agree with this, but you just did a wholesale revert of my second edit, which removed the missing authors and dates that I had added. As for the guidelines, which I included in my first edit summary and shown below, they are clear on what is required:

Title (name) of the website (or its short URL if no plain-language title is discernible); may be wikilinked; will display in italics.
Having both 'publisher' and 'website' is redundant in many cases" and "Name of the publisher; may be wikilinked. Having both 'publisher' and 'website' (a.k.a. 'work') is redundant in many cases."

So, "NFL" and "Pro Football Reference" are the names of the website and are discernible. As such, it's not necessary to include the URL, such as "NFL.com" and "Pro-Football-Reference.com". As for the second point, it's redundant to include both "NFL.com" and "NFL Enterprises". Assadzadeh (talk) 04:45, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Removing large amounts of content without valid reasoning

removing large amounts of content like you did on 2025–26 Premiership Women's Rugby should require a discussion. what is your reason for removal other than totally unnecessary. It's not constructive at all and border line vandalism, you have over 200,000 edits I think you should know to explain your self better. Louis (talk) (contribs) 12:34, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
402	Alton Towers (talk)	Add sources
10	Sport in Leeds (talk)	Add sources
404	Wigan Warriors (talk)	Add sources
71	Rugby Park (talk)	Add sources
154	Adam Jones (rugby union, born 1981) (talk)	Add sources
139	Appalachian State Mountaineers football (talk)	Add sources
7	Megan Davies (rugby union) (talk)	Cleanup
54	Jovan Kirovski (talk)	Cleanup
34	St Ambrose College (talk)	Cleanup
706	Hull Kingston Rovers (talk)	Expand
1,610	Greater Manchester (talk)	Expand
320	Argentina women's national football team (talk)	Expand
53	British comedy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
85	Sheffield Eagles (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
66	Airborne wind energy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5	Tropical Storm Amy (1975) (talk)	Merge
56	Water supply and sanitation in South Africa (talk)	Merge
7	Zee Cine Award for Best Cinematography (talk)	Merge
20	A. E. Coppard (talk)	Wikify
147	Michael Bentine (talk)	Wikify
335	Ingolstadt (talk)	Wikify
6	Blue Point (building) (talk)	Orphan
3	Berlin Genesis (talk)	Orphan
3	Ahmed Yousef Al Ansari (talk)	Orphan
44	Europa Sports Park (talk)	Stub
34	Eribe Doro (talk)	Stub
18	California United Strikers FC (talk)	Stub
110	Pita Ahki (talk)	Stub
11	Matthias Halagahu (talk)	Stub
80	Elliot Minchella (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review: Draft:Layla Drury

Hello @PeeJay, I hope you're well. I noticed your extensive work on Manchester United-related articles and was hoping you might review a draft I've been working on.

The draft is for Draft:Layla Drury, a 16-year-old forward for Manchester United W.F.C. who recently became the club's youngest-ever player and youngest-ever goalscorer (across both the men's and women's teams). She meets WP:FOOTY notability as a professional in the Women's Super League.

It's referenced with independent sources including:

England official Football site (U20 call-up)

BBC Sport, Yahoo Sports, and The New York Times (The Athletic)

Would you be willing to look at the draft?

Given her Manchester United connection, I thought you might have valuable insight.

Thanks for your time and contributions.

Best, Mileslucio (talk) 10:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. – Pee Jay 10:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ! Any way you could help with the approval process ? Mileslucio (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]