User talk:Polbot

User talk:Quadell
This page is a soft redirect.

Polbot was once a bot, and is no longer with us. If you like, you can leave me a message at User talk:Quadell.

Any auto-generated notices about articles-for-deletion or whatnot are rather moot, and make about as much sense as talking to a non-functioning food processor.

Nomination for discussion of Template:Cleanup federal judge bio

Template:Cleanup federal judge bio has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 03:15, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Breyer (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charles Breyer (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:

a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:46, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kensuke Hijikata for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kensuke Hijikata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kensuke Hijikata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Roast (talk) 21:36, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guioa novobritannica

The article Guioa novobritannica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only 1 source and 2 sentences, doesn't feel good enough to quantify an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 02:30, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Perritos de sandia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perritos de sandia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perritos de sandia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Surtsicna (talk) 13:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buchenavia

A tag has been placed on Category:Buchenavia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Lorito-momoto De Buru" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lorito-momoto De Buru has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 31 § Lorito-momoto De Buru until a consensus is reached. Sixaxis^Yes 16:05, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 31 § Lorito-momoto De Buru until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 20:48, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Notiochelidon

A tag has been placed on Category:Notiochelidon indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』『articles I want to eat』 13:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paradelma has been nominated for merging

Category:Paradelma has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』『articles I want to eat』 23:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pitangus has been nominated for merging

Category:Pitangus has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』『articles I want to eat』 18:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Xenornis has been nominated for merging

Category:Xenornis has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』『articles I want to eat』 23:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warbling antbird for merging to Hypocnemis

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warbling antbird is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into Hypocnemis.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warbling antbird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

M kuhner (talk) 23:54, 30 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]