User talk:Predator.1947

November 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Future of the Indian Navy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Future of the Indian Navy was changed by Predator.1947 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95445 on 2025-11-03T14:11:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:11, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Annh07. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Economy of Pakistan have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 15:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 16:44, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 13:10, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Air India fleet. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 05:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please do not add fake details in the List of countries with the most skyscrapers no source or any official count says India has 115 skyscrapers and it doesn't rank 15 also no source says Indonesia have 190+! Even the Council of tall buildings confirms India with 130+ skyscrappers and on the Wikipedia page of List of tallest buildings in Mumbai it confirms that Mumbai alone have more than 250 skyscrapers with locations and coordinates on it. So stop lying and adding fake details. Indranil2003 (talk) 08:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of countries with the most skyscrapers. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:08, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot for noticing but this user (Indranil2003) is constantly adding unsourced content. Predator.1947 (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would be wise for you to step away from that article for a while. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:00, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) evasion to the noted master, you are also evading a block on at least one temporary account.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:00, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]