Wiki Article
User talk:ProgramT
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
Create a article for Marcosism
[edit]Hello ProgramT please create an article for Marcosism from a redirected article on Wikipedia. Thank you!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marcosism&redirect=no Toniker0501 (talk) 11:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have one article for Marcosism
- https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-11-04-me-110-story.html Toniker0501 (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
- I will consider your suggestion, but I cannot give a definitive answer about whether I will create a Marcosism article. ProgramT (talk) 03:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Marcosism – just created it! ProgramT (talk) ProgramT (talk) 05:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Hello ProgramT please add details about this article. Thank you!!! Toniker0501 (talk) 07:24, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
Create a template sidebar for Dutertism
[edit]Hello ProgramT please create a template sidebar for Dutertism on Wikipedia. Thank you!!! Toniker0501 (talk) 07:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't really feel the need to create that template. Even Trumpism, which has far more related articles than Dutertism, does not have a dedicated template. ProgramT (talk) 04:45, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
Create a article for Conservatism in the Philippines
[edit]Hello ProgramT please create an article for Conservatism in the Philippines. Thank you!!! Toniker0501 (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)
- How about creating an article yourself? ProgramT (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry I'm not interested about that. Toniker0501 (talk) 04:00, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- But why are you asking me for a favor? I'm not interested too. ProgramT (talk) 04:01, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry I'm not interested about that. Toniker0501 (talk) 04:00, 6 September 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Second Republic of China (Taiwan) for draftification
[edit]
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Republic of China (Taiwan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.scope_creepTalk 09:58, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
October 2026
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Piñerismo, you may be blocked from editing. ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:41, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- You have been warned in the past and asked to stop. Why have you continued? ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:42, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- Today, I edited Piñerismo for the first time. So I don't know what you're talking about. And why do you call my editing a "vandalize"?? ProgramT (talk) 11:45, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, I accidentally picked the wrong warning. Ive struck it and used the correct warning instead. ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:48, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- Today, I edited Piñerismo for the first time. So I don't know what you're talking about. And why do you call my editing a "vandalize"?? ProgramT (talk) 11:45, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Piñerismo, you may be blocked from editing. Adding LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:48, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- Understood. However, I will revert the edits made to articles that did not use the LLM. I have never used an LLM except when translating articles from other language versions. (Using a simple translator is different from using an LLM.) ProgramT (talk) 11:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- That is also against the guidelines, WP:LLMT only permits you to use an LLM to assist you. It does not permit you to paste whatever the LLM produces, you can't just post a complete WP:MACHINE translation (which the community finds useless anyway). Using an LLM for translation is NOT a loophole to the NOLLM guideline, so do not reinstate those edits. That would also be WP:EDITWARRING, which isn't permitted either. ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:53, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- And if you are pasting unattributed translations from other Wikiprojects, then that is a copyright violation. ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:55, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- Since you are apparently edit warring to reinstate your edits now, can you explain how Diff/1379173678 was produced in six minutes and has signs of AI usage? ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:58, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- I often save what I write in Windows Notepad in advance and edit it later, so it might be misunderstood as if I am using an LLM. I did not use an LLM except for the article on Piñerismo today. ProgramT (talk) 11:59, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- No that doesn't make sense. The edit that was six minutes earlier was also made by you. And using Notepad does not explain the phrasing in the prose. You have most definitely used an AI before the edits to Piñerismo today. Please read WP:USED-AI? and then answer me again, or I will have to bring this to the WP:AIN noticeboard. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:01, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1379173678 I'm not lying. This edit did not actually use an LLM. Please do not upload to WP:AIN. ProgramT (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- I use LLMs only when translating articles from other language versions, and I never use them when I add content myself without translating the original. ProgramT (talk) 12:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- You were also warned about this in § April 2026 (and § Please do not make WP:PROFRINGE coatracks), which was most definitely before today. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:06, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- I used Gemini when editing Piñerismo articles. I did not use an LLM when creating the article on Authoritarian nationalism. I thought it was fine to use an LLM when translating articles from other language versions rather than creating something entirely new. (Authoritarian nationalism is not present in the other language versions.) ProgramT (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- I believe there is a problem with using an LLM to completely create content that did not exist, and I did not make such edits. But is it also prohibited to use an LLM to translate articles from other language versions? I am curious about the available range of LLMs. ProgramT (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1379173678 I'm not lying. This edit did not actually use an LLM. Please do not upload to WP:AIN. ProgramT (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- No that doesn't make sense. The edit that was six minutes earlier was also made by you. And using Notepad does not explain the phrasing in the prose. You have most definitely used an AI before the edits to Piñerismo today. Please read WP:USED-AI? and then answer me again, or I will have to bring this to the WP:AIN noticeboard. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:01, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- I often save what I write in Windows Notepad in advance and edit it later, so it might be misunderstood as if I am using an LLM. I did not use an LLM except for the article on Piñerismo today. ProgramT (talk) 11:59, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- That is also against the guidelines, WP:LLMT only permits you to use an LLM to assist you. It does not permit you to paste whatever the LLM produces, you can't just post a complete WP:MACHINE translation (which the community finds useless anyway). Using an LLM for translation is NOT a loophole to the NOLLM guideline, so do not reinstate those edits. That would also be WP:EDITWARRING, which isn't permitted either. ‑‑gurkubondinn 11:53, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:AI noticeboard regarding your edits. The thread is User:ProgramT. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:22, 8 October 2026 (UTC)