Wiki Article
User talk:Relativity77
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Relativity77! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Sabrina Pasterski. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you. Revolving Doormat (talk) 19:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
[edit]
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Do not make accusations like this, and certainly not in edit summaries: they disfigure an article's history. Drmies (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Revolving Doormat. Do not be accusing other editors of causing a subject grief. Drmies (talk) 22:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)- The COIN discussion reached a consensus: you have a conflict of interest with the subject, and you have not disclosed it, despite being prompted to do so. In addition, you keep edit warring, and your edit summaries are inscrutable--whether the subject is notable because of publications, whatever--notability is not the point, no one questions it. Besides the edit warring there's the personal attacks, where you keep accusing one specific editor of trying to harm the subject, possibly with a racist intent. We can't have that. And finally, for future reference, you should refer to the subject as Dr. Pasterski; calling her what you called her is sexist and profoundly outdated. Drmies (talk) 15:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)