Wiki Article

User talk:Seven77seas

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Welcome Seven77seas!

Hello Seven77seas. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Tazuco, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
  Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Tazuco (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

"responsible reporting guidelines "

[edit]

Can you help me understand what Wikipedia policy you are using with regards to per esponsible reporting guidelines in this edit summary. On the whole I agree with the changes being made, but not all of them. Thanks TiggerJay(talk) 00:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not referring to a wikipedia policy and apologize if that was misleading. I was referring to journalistic guidelines often followed by mainstream media outlets. You can google "journalistic ethics mass shootings" or similar phrases and find many similar guidelines from different institutions with the aim of reducing copycat shootings. Our algorithms are all different but the first one that comes up for me is https://ethics.journalism.wisc.edu/2019/12/12/when-coverage-is-what-they-want/. These guidelines including emphasizing the lives of the victims, decreasing emphasis on the perpetrator, and not simplifying or speculating extensively or at all about the motives of the shootings.
I found it extremely disturbing to go to the Wiki page of a mass shooting that has been billed as a copycat shooting and to find rhetoric, including an extensive biographical indexing of the perpetrator and weapons used while not even naming the victims in many sections, and no biographical or humanizing information on the victims, that feeds the idolization of and fascination with perpetrators in both our broader culture and in deeply disturbed online subcultures, and encourages copycat shootings. Seven77seas (talk) 04:10, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Gestation crate

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gestation crate, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed it. Seven77seas (talk) 00:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OR

[edit]

I saw some of your edit summaries about "Wikipedia is not original research and statements should be cited", and I thought I'd drop a friendly note here to say that the definition of Wikipedia:Glossary#Original research is a bit confusing. Uncited content isn't necessarily OR, and OR isn't measured against only the cited source. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. From further reading, it seems OR refers to linkages or causalities being proposed or implied that are uncited, and citation needed tags are more suited to referring to "self-contained" facts that are uncited. I'll use that lingo accordingly going forward... :) Seven77seas (talk) 22:51, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OR is anything that cannot be properly cited, no matter how hard you try. The most popular way of violating the policy, as you say, is linkages or causalities being proposed or implied, though technically having a citation doesn't prove that the citation supports it, and not having a citation (or having the wrong citation) doesn't prove that it cannot be cited properly by some other source.
For myself, if I remove uncited content, I usually just say something like "uncited". If I believe it's wrong, then I have been known to use "WP:CHALLENGE" as the edit summary. It's probably seen as being a little more aggressive, but I think it makes the point clear: Don't put this back unless you've got a reliable source. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Francis Burger Joint

[edit]

Hello, Seven77seas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Francis Burger Joint".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]