User talk:SevenSpheres

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by .

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for uploading those images under the wrong license

im new also ithink your contributions r cool Anonymsiy (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

copyright problem

this image Small Asteroids and Comets Visited by Spacecraft.jpg includes the copyrighted image of annefrank which got deleted Anonymsiy (talk) 13:27, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That image is under CC-BY. Without evidence to the contrary, we have to assume they have permission from all relevant copyright holders to release it under that license. SevenSpheres (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the trouble

im trying my best Anonymsiy (talk) 19:55, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to upload images from sources that clearly state they are in the public domain or under a free license. Not an old geocities website with images that might be from NASA but don't link to the original source. SevenSpheres (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i added additional sources for the mithra images, proving they are from nasa. Anonymsiy (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for all the notifs from me, i just have to ask you one more thing

could i use File:Small Asteroids and Comets Visited by Spacecraft as of September 2022.png - Wikimedia Commons and crop it for images of annefrank and braille? thanks! Anonymsiy (talk) 09:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there would be a problem with that. SevenSpheres (talk) 19:19, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok i may do it soon Anonymsiy (talk) 20:00, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

also, is there a page where wikipedians can talk about space or smth like that? Anonymsiy (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a general discussion forum (WP:NOTFORUM), but you can talk about editing Wikipedia articles about space at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. SevenSpheres (talk) 17:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have another question

is this image appropriate for the page "list of largest stars?" File:The Size of Large Stars.svg - Wikimedia Commons Anonymsiy (talk) 10:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would be better asked at that page's talk (which I see you've done). It does look like an improvement over the current image. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

also, do you have any suggestions for similar graphics with a space theme for me to make? (prefferably with only 10-20 objects) Anonymsiy (talk) 13:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could this be used for the infobox image for the moon triton?

i removed the lines from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PIA_00329_-_Color_Sequence_of_Triton_Approach_Images.png to make https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Triton.png ! anonymsiy.user‬ 17:55, 20 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

Again, I don't know why you're asking me. Though I see you never got a reply at the List of largest stars talk page. Maybe ping an existing contributor to the article on the Triton talk page. SevenSpheres (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorrys anonymsiy.user‬ 20:19, 20 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

faulty images

this image ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Proteus_Color.png ) is copyrighted by ted stryk. also this image of iapetus ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Iapetus_trailing_natural_color.jpg ) doesent have a source and judging by images from the same creator (gordan ugarkovic) is probably also copyrighted. thanks! anonymsiy.user‬ 17:13, 22 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

Anyone can nominate Commons files for deletion. On the file page, just click on the "Tools" menu at the top right, then "Nominate for deletion". SevenSpheres (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ok thx sorry for all the pingings anonymsiy.user‬ 17:34, 22 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

help! i have nominated a copyrighted file for deletion, and a person who doesent know about nasa image processing is defending it. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Valhalla_crater_on_Callisto.jpg#File:Valhalla_crater_on_Callisto.jpg_2 anonymsiy.user‬ 16:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

sorry for all the topics from me, this is really important

people are using images i made and using them against me (people who dont know a thing about space image processing) could you please help. thanks! https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAnonymsiy#File_source_is_not_properly_indicated:_File:Valhalla_Callisto_VGR1.png (look at valhalla and triton) anonymsiy.user‬ 20:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

i made a rant about it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomy#Some_people_know_nothing_about_space_image_processing anonymsiy.user‬ 07:32, 28 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

the mod keeps putting the images under a different license and i could get unfairly banned from commons :) anonymsiy.user‬ 17:05, 28 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

Would you support deleting the Calydorea xiphioides redirect?

Hi @SevenSpheres. A few years back you created [this redirect page from Calydorea xiphoides to Calydorea. I do understand that it can be good for the encyclopedia to handle missing info by directing users to related existing pages, but I think this redirect is probably not helpful on balance. First, having the redirect makes Calydorea xiphioides show up as a blue link, giving the impression that content exists when it doesn't. Second, as there are no pages or redirect links for the other 20 accepted species in the genus, it gives the false impression that there's something special about Calydorea xiphioides. Even if someone had the time and energy to create a bunch more redirect pages, that wouldn't really improve things for readers. It seems better to avoid redirect pages so that, when some of these species-specific pages get created, the presence of blue links makes that clear. What do you think? Rupert Clayton (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I created the redirect because it's linked from Gliese 367 b. Since the article doesn't exist, there are three ways that link could be handled:

Leave it as a red link, which is unhelpful when we have information on the topic;
Create a piped link directly to Calydorea, which would need to be updated if an article on the species is created;
Or create a redirect, which points to the genus now and to the species if it ever becomes an article.

You make a valid point also; you could take it to RfD and see what others say. SevenSpheres (talk) 23:39, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for all the posts but...

i just wanna say you are a very good person and you should become a moderator for the space side of wikipedia anonymsiy.user‬ 15:50, 28 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

so, because of the nasa images thread, could i possibly port this image on commons yet?

https://www.planetary.org/space-images/triton_hiresmf1 anonymsiy.user‬ 15:51, 30 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]

It says it's a mosaic, composited from several raw images. I find it hard to believe that wouldn't create a new copyright (it's hardly a trivial change), though I'm sure the people in that thread would say it's public domain because it has NASA in the credit line. You can try uploading it and see what happens; consensus about copyright can change on a whim it seems. SevenSpheres (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

well, im a bit worried about that, as i have one more chance before i get blocked due to you know who saying so. ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anonymsiy#You_may_be_blocked_soon ) i think it has to do with this image i uploaded ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Natural_color_global_view_of_Saturn_and_its_rings.jpg ) which is really weird of him for me to get threatened because of that. anonymsiy.user‬ 19:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymsiy (talk • contribs) [reply]