User talk:Shadowfax33

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 5.

Notification of community ban

I have closed the ANI thread, in which there is consensus for you to be community banned. Please see WP:UNBAN for your path to appeal. —Ingenuity (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I m not exactly sure what is the reason behind the ban. The admins brought the

WP:NONAZIS

and NORACISTS, which is absurd. I never claimed to be affiliated with Nazis. The Admins called me a Neonazi and dishonest for pointing out that I identify with some elements of "Groypers" because I identify as Catholic, the Groypers or Nick Fuentes movement is rooted in Catholicism. I kindly ask for the opening of the discussion

ANI discussion

board.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1320445538#Openly_racist_editor_Shadowfax33

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Shadowfax33&oldid=1319905697 Shadowfax33 (talk) 15:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Shadowfax33, since the ban is now in place, you need to follow the CBAN instructions at WP:UNBAN. Banned editors can't open nor participate in discussions at ANI.

I can see that this wasn't just because you openly identified with Groypers, but because your edits weren't neutral, were problematic and also appeared to fall in line with the beliefs of Groypers. This has nothing to do with being Catholic so I have no idea where you got that from. I know plenty of Catholics, and they would be horrified by the beliefs and actions of Groypers.

If you plan to appeal, make sure to read through the concerns raised by the multiple editors who voted for the ban and thoroughly address each one directly in your appeal - this isn't as simple as one misunderstanding. Blue Sonnet (talk) 15:49, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Blue Sonnet, the edits I made were neutral and objective. If you think the Groyper and Nick Fuentes Wikipedia articles are not biased, you clearly don't understand the movement. I was banned for my Catholic identity. Catholicism is a fundamental part of the Nick Fuentes movement. Since you know many Catholics, ask them what they think of Nick Fuentes. Banning me by the "community" shows how much Wikipedia has a prejudice against Groypers and Catholics. Interestingly, you allow a sockpuppet account to report me while creating multiple accounts in the process only to cause harm. Read the ANI discussion board again, which proves this is about getting banned because of the identification with the Groyper movement, which is a Catholic movement; the edits were used only as an excuse to ban me.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1320445538#Openly_racist_editor_Shadowfax33

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Shadowfax33&oldid=1319905697 Shadowfax33 (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying, but I can't really do anything about this. If you want to appeal then you'll need to follow the current process.

BTW I asked three very good friends out of interest before weighing in originally, they were pretty surprised (and one was slightly offended) that I'd even considered that they'd ever be ok with that sort of thing. They've been Catholic all their lives, one is Irish Catholic. They don't see his beliefs as having anything to do with Catholicism, especially the whole "Catholic Taliban" thing and his beliefs about Hitler. I believe his own Catholic parents feel the same.

Anyway, since you should only be talking about your block directly on your Talk page, I absolutely will not be discussing this any further as the whole experience made me feel slightly ill. Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Hi @Shadowfax33; please note that when banned your only use of this talk page should be for posting unban requests; not for experimenting with formatting. CoconutOctopus talk 14:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]