User talk:Tinadang

This is Tinadang's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: PresenceLearning (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheObsidianGriffon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PresenceLearning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tinadang! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Hello Tinadang. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:PresenceLearning, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tinadang. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tinadang|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. To be clear, you are considered a paid editor if you are employed by this company, regardless of whether you are specifically paid to edit Wikipedia. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Helpful Raccoon, thanks for the note.

I'm an employee of PresenceLearning, Inc., the subject of Draft:PresenceLearning, and I understand that this constitutes a conflict of interest under Wikipedia’s paid editing and COI guidelines. I apologize for not having made the required disclosure earlier.

I will add the appropriate paid editing disclosure to my user page and will refrain from further direct editing of the draft while this is addressed. Going forward, I will follow the Articles for Creation process and use the draft talk page to propose changes as needed.

Thank you for the clarification. Tinadang (talk) 16:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Tinadang You are still allowed to edit the draft while it is still a draft after you make the required disclosure. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]