Wiki Article

User talk:TylerBurden

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

József Sebestyén's unit

[edit]

Hi, I was just curious if the article about József Sebestyén should mention the unit he was conscripted into Lazarbeem (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazarbeem Maybe somewhere in the article depending on the sources, but since he didn't actually serve in the military, it makes no sense to give him a military infobox. Also I would recommend using the article talk page for stuff like this since more people can participate. TylerBurden (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is BLP-related_content_dispute. Thank you. AlexeyKhrulev (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Valereee
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Russian Ground Forces, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good bot. TylerBurden (talk) 00:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editor (?)

[edit]

Hi, I just wanted you to let know that a user named Mr.User200 has been showing quite a lot of disruptive behavior against me (almost feels like harassment right now). Reverting edits without the usage of edit summaries/zero explanations, stalking my edits and doing the same thing over and over again: [1], [2], [3], [4] and [5]. He has been doing this for several weeks now, and now he is accusing me of being a sockpuppet account of a account I didn’t even know it existed, at the page of: User talk:El C (see: User with disruptive edits behaviour). He wants to start a investigation against me, which I’m fully open for as I know to be fully innocent, but is such behavior normal and acceptable? From his user page I can see that he seems to be acting as a sort of a ‘’sockpuppet police’’, without him even being a admin. Many of his edits are without any edit summaries, and then he accuses me of showing disruptive behavior. I mean, this has to be a joke or something like that, right?


I wanted to report this sort of harassment behavior, as it seems like that he really tries to change the topic from his own disruptive behavior to me being a ‘’sockpuppet’’, but would like to know the opinions from others who have more experience with what seems to be a quite old user. Woxic1589 (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Woxic1589 I have seen plenty of WP:TENDENTIOUS signs from this editor, which is certainly a form of disruption. But in terms of the behavior towards you, the correct venue would be WP:AN/I, or regarding their edits, WP:AE, since it appears to concern a WP:CTOP. If he fancies himself above the rules then administrators can give their opinion there, though it is important that you have specific examples of policy violations in that case. TylerBurden (talk) 05:54, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will keep that in mind. Woxic1589 (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just as I expected, he again attemps to change the topic by accusing me of being a sockpuppet from his sockpuppet list: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gala19000#Suspected sockpuppets. But again, thanks for your explanation and information. Woxic1589 (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, TylerBurden!

[edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 07:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, the same to you. :) TylerBurden (talk) 12:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Two barnstars for you!

[edit]
The Russia Barnstar of National Merit
This is for your contributions related to Russians. Pachu Kannan (talk) 19:13, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Order of Merit of Ukraine
This is for your contributions related to Ukrainians.
this WikiAward was given to TylerBurden by Pachu Kannan (talk) on 19:13, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]