Wiki Article
User talk:Ullscarf
Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net
Hello, Ullscarf, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Below are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! Masterhatch (talk) 18:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Who I am
[edit]Is irrelvant, and not a subject for discussion on article talk pages. Slatersteven (talk) 18:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not asking for your personal details, I'm trying to get a handle on how this works. Ullscarf (talk) 19:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I am allowed to ask for a close, if the discussion is going around in circles. Also you need to read wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven (talk) 19:10, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well I don't know about bludgeoning but I can certainly see that trying to get sense out of you and your colleagues is a waste of energy. I mean being asked for evidence that Robinson is not far-right just takes the biscuit. I could hardly be less impressed with my experience today, putting it mildly. Ullscarf (talk) 19:19, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- No we said RS need to say it for us to say it. They need to challenge the idea he is far-right. We go by what RS say and only what RS say. Slatersteven (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- A journalist using sensational language is not a reliable source but as you said, we're now going round in circles. If you're something to do with Wikipedia, you might want to suggest a reassessment of what counts as a reliable source.
- Years ago, there was some nonsense on the Wikipedia acid jazz (music genre) page and I drew attention to it in the talk section. I was an acid jazz dj in London at the height of the scene and worked for Acid Jazz Records, so I called b/s but was informed that it was from an article in the Indian Times, which counted as a reliable source. I'm sure you get my drift. Ullscarf (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I am just an editor. Slatersteven (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- No we said RS need to say it for us to say it. They need to challenge the idea he is far-right. We go by what RS say and only what RS say. Slatersteven (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well I don't know about bludgeoning but I can certainly see that trying to get sense out of you and your colleagues is a waste of energy. I mean being asked for evidence that Robinson is not far-right just takes the biscuit. I could hardly be less impressed with my experience today, putting it mildly. Ullscarf (talk) 19:19, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- I am allowed to ask for a close, if the discussion is going around in circles. Also you need to read wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven (talk) 19:10, 15 September 2025 (UTC)