User talk:VZ9999

November 2025

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. An edit that you recently made to Crna Glava seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LizardJr8 (talk) 02:33, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LizardJr8. I understand about my first edit. Thank you for telling me. VZ9999 (talk) 23:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Nikos Xilouris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was like this:

Career

________

Life

_______

……

so I did the logical thing and removed career ~2025-35279-94 (talk) 00:00, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait I forgot to log in VZ9999 (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And now cuz of the new update you can’t see it anymore VZ9999 (talk) 00:25, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D2s1 (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Aesurias were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

+ Incorrect formatting

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D2s1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aesurias (talk) 00:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VZ9999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aesurias (talk) 00:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello VZ9999! The thread you created at the Teahouse, d2s1, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:19, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, VZ9999, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!  — Amakuru (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

back to the interview, why did you want to come and support a opposing team(no offence btw) VZ9999 (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Main Page

Please stop posting inane comments at Talk:Main Page as they are becoming increasingly disruptive. If you have questions about how Wikipedia works or how you can do something, please ask at the WP:Teahouse. - SchroCat (talk) 07:11, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Echo the above. You say you don’t need Behaviour guidelines but considering how people have responded negatively to your comments, I suggest you give each them a read. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 17:53, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have read all the WP's VZ9999 (talk) 20:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi VZ9999 maybe you don't need this, but I'm trying to help you here. You're a very new editor here, and you don't know all the customs and things that we have on Wikipedia. That's fine, everyone was new once. But as someone experienced here, I'm just letting you know that you're causing some annoyance with your comments at the Talk:Main Page thread. Typically in a discussion like that, people give their views as a single bulleted comment, either "support" if you like the proposal or "oppose" otherwise. Sometimes editors also reply to other editoes' comments, if there's something about the vote they'd like to challenge, or if they feel there's a different angle to be taken. That's what's happening in the debate there. Some people like me think the proposal is a good one, and we've given our reasons. Other people prefer the current arrangement of saying From and they've also said why. It sounds from what you say as if you support the "oppose" viewpoint, so if you like you can put that down as a bulleted vote and give your reasons. What you can't do, though, is put lots of comments all over the discussion about how you think it's a waste of time and how it's obvious we should say "from the featured article". Yours is only one view, and it isn't necessarily the one that enjoys most support, that's what the discussion is for. Posting repeated comments that don't add anything new to the discussion is often taken as a disruptive thing, as explained at WP:BLUDGEON. Put simply, people including the two posters above are losing their patience with you and you might end up blocked from either the discussion page or even the wider website if you continue down that route. So my advice is this : leave a bulleted vote with a reason for opposing if you want to, and then leave it at that. Go and do some other things in the project. Cheers, and happy editing.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

thanked Amrabdelmoghethmohamed (talk) 20:46, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]