Waypoint47 is away on vacation and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello, Waypoint47, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  SounderBruce 19:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Waypoint47,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Agụma for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Agụma to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 02:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make the page it was another person's page and I tried to move it to draft so it probably was moved already, Sorry about that! Waypoint47 (talk) 03:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider waiting to make articles, such as in the case of the 2025 Nashua shooting article. While it may be determined that the incident is notable enough to warrant an article, at the time you created one there was essentially nothing known about the circumstances of the incident. Raskuly (talk) 02:36, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Nashua shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Nashua shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Raskuly (talk) 21:38, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined your WP:A10 speedy deletion tag of Draft:Salish matter, since A speedy deletion criteria only apply in mainspace (article space), so they do not apply to drafts. Toadspike [Talk] 13:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thats alright I didn't know but what do we do about duplicate drafts? Waypoint47 (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. Only one can make it to mainspace, but in draft or userspace they're causing no harm. Eventually they will likely be abandoned and gobbled up by WP:G13. (More generally, G13 means we can be more lax with speedy-tagging drafts.) Toadspike [Talk] 14:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ultraodan was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I've tagged a couple links as dead and one as needing a better source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salish Matter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ultraodan (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Waypoint47! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ultraodan (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Culpeper County Public Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have concerns with some of your AI-assisted edits on Culpeper, Virginia. As @Magnolia677 pointed out [1], many of your additions are not verifiable by the cited sources. For example, you cited page 45 of the book The official Virginia Civil War battlefield guide, but the page doesn't say anything about Culpeper. [2] When using AI, you should verify the sources it cites as errors are common. Please refer to help page WP:LLM for further guidance. Ca ^{talk to me!} 06:12, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:31, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your message I am very confused what page did I accidentally do this on? Waypoint47 (talk) 01:06, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you violated MOS:GEOLINK/MOS:OVERLINK

Hi Waypoint47. Thank you for your work on Lake Culpeper. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:23, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]