User talk:Writingflows321

This is Writingflows321's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: AI Tools for Wholesale Sourcing on B2B Sites (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kovcszaln6 were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make sure to read this guide before continuing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AI Tools for Wholesale Sourcing on B2B Sites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 12:50, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Writingflows321! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 12:50, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AI Tools for Wholesale Sourcing on B2B Sites (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AI Tools for Wholesale Sourcing on B2B Sites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobby! Thank you for taking the time to review my article. I am a little lost in regards to the same comment about how it is reading like an essay rather than an encyclopedic article. I took out all promotional and subjective phrases making sure that every single sentence was attributed to appropriate secondary sources. I am not sure why I am still getting the same comments about it reading like an essay?

I have read other Wikipedia articles and find that this reads just like them, so if you could kindly clarify what do you mean when you say it sounds like an essay?

If there are any unreliable secondary sources, please flag. There are no opinions in the article, I am not sure what that is referring to? Every single sentence is attributed to a secondary source with extensive attention paid to wordings to avoid any promotional, or non-neutral langauge.

I have not used any LLM's to write the article, if anything if it sounds like its written by an LLM its because I had to edit it extensively to take out any language that Wikipedia would deem not neutral, so if there is vaugeness it is because I am trying to follow your neutrality standard. What can I do to improve the article according to Wikipedia standards? Writingflows321 (talk) 17:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Applications of artificial intelligence

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Applications of artificial intelligence, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:52, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it, please check. Writingflows321 (talk) 12:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]