User talk:Xcalibur19

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan

December 2025

Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Troy Costa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 01:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message will check. Xcalibur19 (talk) 13:01, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Economy of Sindh did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Stickymatch 05:12, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Xcalibur19 (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Habib Bank AG Zurich, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stickymatch 05:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about Manual of Style. Xcalibur19 (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Annh07. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Economy of Pakistan have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 13:48, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Edits and are in accordance with the sources already cited. I have made updates to the page that are proper and from well known sources Xcalibur19 (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Economy of Pakistan. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 06:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Edits and are in accordance with the sources already cited. I have made updates to the page that are proper and from well known sources. Xcalibur19 (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't provided any sources [1]. The information you've updated doesn't match the sources in the article (see here). For example:

You've updated GDP (nominal) from 410.5 (source) to 480.5 (no source).
You've updated GDP per capita (nominal) from 1,707 (source) to 2,500 (no source).
You've updated GDP per capita (PPP) from 6,951 (source) to 8,000 (no source).

Annh07 (talk) 06:31, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan's GDP PPP per Capita: $8,070 This figure is derived from a GDP (PPP) of $2,058 billion, which accounts for the informal economy and any base year - Worldeconomics.com - 2025 Xcalibur19 (talk) 06:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.worldeconomics.com/GDP-Per-Capita/Pakistan.aspx Xcalibur19 (talk) 06:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite the source in the article. Also, this source only refers to GDP per capita (PPP); you need to provide the source for both GDP (nominal) and GDP per capita (nominal). Annh07 (talk) 07:03, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GDP Per Capital (Nominal)

https://sdpi.org/9206/blogs_detail - Informal economy to cross $500b - Sustainable Development Policy Institute.

https://moneymatters.com.pk/pakistan-informal-economy-500b/ - Pakistans - Pakistan’s Informal Economy Projected to Exceed $500 Billion - Money Matters Pakistan. Xcalibur19 (talk) 07:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Lucretius, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. NebY (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thanks - I will be watching Great Lucretius from now on he is very important to my work. Xcalibur19 (talk) 12:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Lucretius for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. NebY (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know Xcalibur19 (talk) 14:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xcalibur19! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Venus (mythology) and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. NebY (talk) 15:32, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know I will be careful about it. Xcalibur19 (talk) 01:46, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to mark your edits as minor. Addition and removal of content is never minor. Please stop doing that. NebY (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Arabian Sea and Arabian Sea, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Xcalibur19! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Stickymatch 05:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Xcalibur19 (talk) 12:43, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Xcalibur19! Your additions to Economy of Sindh have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:06, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Xcalibur19 (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of Sindh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maritime. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Xcalibur19 (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of Sindh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merck.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Xcalibur19 (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Xcalibur19, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. When you feel ready to create your first biography, you'll find useful guidance in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Xcalibur19 (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Xcalibur19. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. NebY (talk) 20:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - January 2026

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360

Online events:

New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A
Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025

Announcements from other communities

Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026.

Tip of the month:

Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Quantam1986 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quantam1986. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 09:05, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]