User talk:Yogi3677

Welcome

Hello, Yogi3677, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia) The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Yogi3677, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yogendra Puranik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yogendra Puranik, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogendra Puranik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Yogendra Puranik. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kingsacrificer (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of the commentary was personal analysis? Can you please explain with examples. Yogi3677 (talk) 23:27, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Yogendra Puranik, you may be blocked from editing. Kingsacrificer (talk) 12:39, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your basis and source to judge that the information is poorly sourced? So many books and newspapers have written about Yogendra Puranik. Yogi3677 (talk) 23:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Yogendra or are you related to him in any way? Kingsacrificer (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the poorly sourced content which was present in previous revisions. Even now, there is some information in the article which is not sourced or cited to a reliable reference. For example, the entire Life In Japan section and information about his educational background. Kingsacrificer (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My question is, what is your basis and source to judge that the information is poorly sourced? So many books and newspapers have written about Yogendra Puranik. Yogi3677 (talk) 23:12, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:PROOF.

If books and newspapers have written about him, that information needs to be referenced and cited in the article. Once reliable sources are used to back any claims or information in the article, its usage becomes acceptable. Kingsacrificer (talk) 06:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a conflict of interest

Hello, Yogi3677. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:37, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than deleting what others have written, please do some constructive research to add useful content, that will serve the purpose for a bigger community of wiki readers. Your activity to 'delete' is not at all serving any purpose as you wont be able to prove that the information that you deleted was wrong or subjective. Yogi3677 (talk) 23:17, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check WP:COI? Kingsacrificer (talk) 06:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]