User talk:ZZ510

Welcome!

Hello, ZZ510, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Knitsey (talk) 16:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PAID

Hello ZZ510. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ZZ510. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ZZ510|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Polygnotus (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings, dear sir. I am truly, truly sorry for replying so late. When you left your message, I had just joined Wikipedia and didn’t really know what was going on until I gradually learned. One of the colleagues recently told me that you had sent me a message and that I hadn’t responded, and their question was exactly the same as yours. I have absolutely never received any money from anyone, because Wikipedia is only a hobby for me, and I am always ready to help Wikipedia by creating new articles and making edits. I never take money at all. Moreover, if you don’t believe me, I am willing to do anything you like to prove it to you. And I truly apologize for replying so late. ZZ510 (talk) 22:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hi, I see your talk page was given a notice about paid editing in December last year, which said In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message., and you didn't answer it.

Are you receiving or expecting to receive compensation for your edits? Belbury (talk) 22:22, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings dear sir. I do not receive any money whatsoever for my edits. Since last year was my first time joining Wikipedia, I did not know how to post or reply to messages on my talk page, so I didn’t see the previous notice, and I sincerely apologize for that. Creating and improving Wikipedia articles is my only hobby, and I never violate Wikipedia’s policies. I am willing to do anything necessary to prove that I do not receive any compensation, and I always try my best to help Wikipedia by creating or improving articles. I would also appreciate it if you could kindly reply on my behalf to the person who left the previous message for me and let them know that I am truly sorry. ZZ510 (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also replied to the person who had sent me a message, and I’m really thankful that you told me they had messaged me. ZZ510 (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peoples Elbow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peoples Elbow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peoples Elbow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kingsacrificer (talk) 18:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that a deletion tag was added to the Peoples Elbow article. After reviewing the sources, I believe the topic meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, as it has been covered by multiple reliable secondary sources and has had cultural impact beyond wrestling. I respectfully suggest reconsidering the deletion tag, as the article can be improved and clarified rather than removed. Thank you for your time and your contributions to Wikipedia. ZZ510 (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article's AFD is still under discussion. You have already commented on it. I'd rather wait for an admin to close the discussion than withdraw it myself. Kingsacrificer (talk) 18:35, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paris derby

The article Paris derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no real rivalry between Paris FC and PSG. With Matra Racing there was during the 1980s, but it was short-lived. There is no reason to create this article, the so-called rivalry has no historic or sporting background or animosity. It's not The Paris derby or Paris derby, it's just A Paris derby, like it would be Red Star against FC Versailles 78 or Creteil or anything in between.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paris derby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paris derby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris derby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Svartner (talk) 13:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that a PROD deletion tag was added to the Paris derby article. I’ve reviewed the sources and the coverage, and I believe the topic is notable enough to remain as a standalone article. Since PROD has already been declined in discussion, would you please consider removing the deletion tag? Thank you for your time and for your contributions to Wikipedia. ZZ510 (talk) 15:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]