User talk:Zenomemo

July 2025

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. An edit that you recently made to Polytechnic Secondary School seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 14:43, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zenomemo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zenomemo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 14:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Hirtenbach (Bühler). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 03:00, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your message. You're right. I noticed that some of the sources I used were mirrors. I'll be more careful about this from now on and use independently verifiable references. Zenomemo (talk) 07:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, here. Please be more cautious when evaluating sources. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zenomemo - just to follow on from the message Kuru sent you - you've created several articles recently that all have sourcing problems:

2013 in African music - listed Ray Phiri as dying in 2013, even though he actually died in 2017. Ray Phiri is not mentioned at all in the citation given.
2013 in French music - all citation links lead to 404's. (I've fixed the Georges Moustaki reference for you - please can you fix the rest.)
2013 in German music - listed Peter Behrens and Wolfgang Rohde as having died in 2013, even though they both died in 2016. The citation was titled "Musicians who have died in 2016", so I'm finding it difficult to understand how this error occurred.

I've fixed some of the above for you, but please be more careful around sourcing. I also noted that you content assessment self-rated all of these articles as a B - I think this is a bit of an overestimate and have reassessed them for you. BugGhost 🦗👻 17:06, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had a look at your other article 2021 in badminton and found other sourcing errors. The citations are either broken (eg. [1], which doesn't exist and I can't find it on the wayback machine), or are way too generic and don't support the text in the article that they are attached to (eg. info about a cup held in Finland, won by China, with the source badmintonafrica.com, which is completely unrelated). Because of these issues, I have moved the article to draft space, and I think you should go through the WP:AFC process when it is ready and these issues are sorted. BugGhost 🦗👻 17:45, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2021 in badminton moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2021 in badminton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the sources are insufficient - they are either 404, or do not back up the specific content that is in the article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BugGhost 🦗👻 17:36, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Australian DFAT country human rights reports for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Australian DFAT country human rights reports is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian DFAT country human rights reports until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Triptothecottage (talk) 06:50, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fighting hate crimes in Turkey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fighting hate crimes in Turkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fighting hate crimes in Turkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Triptothecottage (talk) 06:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submissions

These long essays you are writing are unsuitable in form for an encyclopedia, and they also show signs of LLM use in their writing. The latter is completely unacceptable, and may result in your articles being summarily deleted. Mangoe (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zenomemo. Thank you for your work on Anterior vertebral vein. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It seems reasonable to cover this, and I can't see that it is covered elsewhere. While this and similar articles remain short, there's an argument for consolidating them in one place, perhaps discussing the venous drainage of the cervical region. It would be helpful to have some pathophysiological discussion related to the importance of this drainage too.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zenomemo. Thank you for your work on Pericardiophrenic veins. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for helping to build this rather poor area of coverage on Wikipedia; there certainly seems to be better coverage on the arterial side! As marked on the page, it would be helpful to find other sources to support the notability of these structures; otherwise, consolidation of related articles might be be warranted.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:35, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Zenomemo. Thank you for your work on Musculophrenic veins. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for another article helping to build content. Again, further sources would be helpful. Wikidata also looks a little confused on this topic, seeming to suggests a common musculophrenic vein into which other tributaries (set of musculophrenic veins) drain. Regardless, this is a good place to discuss the set.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:47, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI use

Are you using AI for your edits here? If so, can you mention:

What tool(s) you are using and what version
What prompts and features you are using
What review you are doing of the output

Also can you please respond to this in your own words, as it is not allowed to use LLMs to generate talk page comments. NicheSports (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021 in badminton

Hello, Zenomemo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 in badminton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2021 in badminton

Hello, Zenomemo. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2021 in badminton".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]