हिंदुत्व आंदोलन के दक्खिनपंथी अतिवाद के एगो रूप मानल जाला, आ 'परंपरात रूप में लगभग फासिस्ट' मानल जाला जे बहुमत के एकरूपतावाद आ सांस्कृतिक बर्चस्व के आपन आदर्श बनावे ला।[7][8][9] कुछ लोग हिंदुत्व के अलगाववादी बिचारधारा (सेप्रेटिस्ट आइडियोलॉजी) के रूप में बर्णित करे ला।[10][11] कुछ बिश्लेष्क लोग हिंदुत्व के पहिचान फासीवाद से करे के ऊपर बिबाद करे ला आ एकरा के अतिवादी पुरातनपंथी धारणा भा एथनिक एब्सोल्यूटिज्म के रूप में देखे ला।[12]
↑Frykenberg 2008, pp. 178–220 harv error: no target: CITEREFFrykenberg2008 (help): "This essay attempts to show how — from an analytical or from an historical perspective — Hindutva is a melding of Hindu fascism and Hindu fundamentalism."
↑Anthony Parel (2000). Gandhi, Freedom, and Self-rule. Lexington Books. p. 133. ISBN978-0-7391-0137-7. The agendas of Hindutva though strong on the issues of self - identity and self - definition, have tended to be separatist.
↑Chetan Bhatt; Parita Mukta (May 2000). "Hindutva in the West: Mapping the Antinomies of Diaspora Nationalism". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 23 (3): 407–441. doi:10.1080/014198700328935. S2CID143287533. Quote: "It is also argued that the distinctively Indian aspects of Hindu nationalism, and the RSS's disavowal of the seizure of state power in preference for long-term cultural labour in civil society, suggests a strong distance from both German Nazism and Italian Fascism. Part of the problem in attempting to classify Golwalkar's or Savarkar's Hindu nationalism within the typology of 'generic fascism', Nazism, racism and ethnic or cultural nationalism is the unavailability of an appropriate theoretical orientation and vocabulary for varieties of revolutionary conservatism and far-right-wing ethnic and religious absolutist movements in 'Third World' countries".