Garza v. Idaho
| Iri |
legal case (en)  United States Supreme Court decision (en) |
|---|---|
| Ƙasa | Tarayyar Amurka |
| Applies to jurisdiction (en) | Tarayyar Amurka |
| Defendant (en) | |
| Court (en) | Babban kotun Koli na Amurka |
Garza v. Idaho , 586 US ___, 139 S. Ct. 738 (2019), ya kasance mai shari'ar Kotun Koli ta Amurka ya gabatar da cewa zato na nuna bambanci don dalilai na Kwaskwarima na shida ya shafi ko mai tuhuma ya yi watsi da 'yancin ɗaukaka ƙara.[1]
Bayan Fage
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]A cikin shekara ta 2015, mai gabatar da kara Gilberto Garza, Jr. ya sanya hannu kan yarjeniyoyin neman yarda guda biyu wadanda suka bukace shi da ya yi watsi da hakkinsa na daukaka kara. Bayan yanke hukunci, Garza ya sanar da lauyan da ake yi masa shari'a game da burinsa na daukaka kara. Saboda rangwamen roko da Garza ya sanyawa hannu, lauya ya ki gabatar da sanarwar daukaka kara. Bayan lokacin da za a gabatar da daukaka kara bai kare ba, Garza ya shigar da kara don neman sassauci bayan yanke hukunci kan rashin taimako na lauya . Kotun da ke shari'ar ta ki amincewa da sassaucin kuma Kotun daukaka kara na Idaho ta tabbatar. Kotun Koli ta Idaho ta tabbatar, inda ta yanke hukuncin cewa zaton adalci kamar yadda aka sani a Roe v. Flores-Ortega baya aiki lokacin da wanda ake kara ya yarda ya yafe damar daukaka kara.
Ra'ayi
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Amir Ali ya gabatar da hujja ta baka ga Garza a gaban Kotun Koli, tare da Ken Jorgensen da Alon Kedem da ke wakiltar Jihar Idaho da Amurka, bi da bi. Kotun ta sanar da hukuncin da ta yanke wa wanda ya shigar da karar a ranar 27 ga watan Fabrairu, shekara ta 2019, tare da kotun ta sauya kuma ta sake shi da kuri’ar 6-3.
Ra'ayin Kotun
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Mafi yawan ra'ayi, wanda Sotomayor ya rubuta kuma ya haɗu da Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, da Kavanaugh, sun tabbatar da cewa shari'ar ta Garza ba ta da wani taimako. A cikin Strickland v. Washington, Kotun Koli ta tabbatar da cewa wanda ake kara da ke da'awar rashin taimako na lauya dole ne ya tabbatar da wakilcin lauya ya fadi kasa da makasudin haƙiƙanin dai-daito kuma irin wannan rashi na nuna adawa ga tsaron.
Rashin yarda
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]Mai Shari'a Thomas, tare da Gorsuch kuma Alito ya shiga wani sashi, ya gabatar da ra'ayoyin da ba su amince da shi ba wanda ke nuna cewa kariyar ta yi dai-dai ta hanyar kin shigar da kara. 'Yan adawar sun ce da ra'ayin masu rinjaye ya kirkiri dokar "wanda ake kara-a koyaushe-yana samun nasara" wanda ba shi da tushe a dokar shari'ar da ta gabata ko Kwaskwarimar ta Shida. Kashi na III na rashin amincewar Thomas, tare da Gorsuch amma ba Alito ba, yana ba da shawarar Gideon v. Wainwright (a shekara ta1963) an yanke hukunci ba daidai ba kuma ya kamata a soke shi.
Duba kuma
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- Ra'ayoyin lokacin 2018 na Kotun Koli na Amurka
Manazarta
[gyara sashe | gyara masomin]- ↑ "Garza v. Idaho." Wikipedia, Insakulofidiya ta kyauta. 23 Oktoba 2021, 05:45 UTC. 23 Oktoba 2021, 05:45 <https://ha.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garza_v._Idaho&oldid=120435>.