^Portugal, J; Waring, MJ (Feb 28, 1988). “Assignment of DNA binding sites for 4′,6-diamidine-2-phenylindole and bisbenzimide (Hoechst 33258). A comparative footprinting study”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta949 (2): 158–68. doi:10.1016/0167-4781(88)90079-6. PMID2449244.
^Kubbies, M; Rabinovitch, PS (January 1983). “Flow cytometric analysis of factors which influence the BrdUrd-Hoechst quenching effect in cultivated human fibroblasts and lymphocytes”. Cytometry3 (4): 276–81. doi:10.1002/cyto.990030408. PMID6185287.
^Breusegem, SY; Clegg, RM; Loontiens, FG (Feb 1, 2002). “Base-sequence specificity of Hoechst 33258 and DAPI binding to five (A/T)4 DNA sites with kinetic evidence for more than one high-affinity Hoechst 33258-AATT complex”. Journal of Molecular Biology315 (5): 1049–61. doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.5301. PMID11827475.
^Iain Johnson, Michelle T.Z. Spence, ed (2011). Molecular Probes Handbook: A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies (11 ed.). Invitrogen. ISBN0-9829279-1-6
^Kubbies, M (1990). “Flow cytometric recognition of clastogen induced chromatin damage in G0/G1 lymphocytes by non-stoichiometric Hoechst fluorochrome binding”. Cytometry11 (3): 386–94. doi:10.1002/cyto.990110309. PMID1692786.
^Sterzel, W; Bedford, P; Eisenbrand, G (June 1985). “Automated determination of DNA using the fluorochrome Hoechst 33258”. Analytical Biochemistry147 (2): 462–7. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90299-4. PMID2409841.