Talk:AI datacenter

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2025. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Cognitive science (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Computing: CompSci Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}} Robotics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Systems: Cybernetics Mid‑importance Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Cybernetics. Technology Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Transhumanism Mid‑importance AI datacenter' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help click Show: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. Quick help: Main talk page Article layout Links to Transhumanism information and Wikipedia:Research resources Writing about religion and Article development Citing sources, Verifying sources and Original research Assume good faith and be civil See changes to: Core articles Transhumanism article New Transhumanism articles edit - history - watch - purge To Do List: Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members Help with articles. See this month's adopt an article. Help out with the To-do lists Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see: The perfect article, and Featured articles) Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template) Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box) Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles Maintenance / Etc Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources. Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process) Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles) And always write for an encyclopedia. Create Notable transhumanist articles Shorten / merge into others Expand a transhumanism stub Your immediate attention false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes. China Mid‑importance China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Government Low‑importance United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance). Artificial Intelligence High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Low‑importance Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Software: Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Energy Mid‑importance Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment: Sustainability High‑importance Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Sustainability task force. Climate change High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide Electrical engineering High‑importance Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Asian / Chinese / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Asian military history task force Chinese military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Science Policy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

The article has 30+ references including links to whitehouse discussion and some of the most important companies in the world. Should the notability warning be removed?   Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

as they contain significant copyright violations

No they don't. There was no direct copying. And the article cited was mostly just a copy of openai's facts in their blog post. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lets be smart about copyright violations versus paranoid. Lets looks deeper into fair use:

• Purpose & Character: This is for non-profit and educational use.
• Nature of the Work: Using factual works is more acceptable than creative ones. (e.g., a news report vs. a novel).
• Amount & Substantiality: Using a small, essential portion is better than copying the whole work.
• Market Effect: Does your copy harm the market for the original work? (Crucial factor). No, quite the opposite. Citing a source drives content and money to original content creator.

Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

unreliable, self-published sources and speculative content

16:56, 21 December 2025 TotalVibe945 talk contribs 41,235 bytes −18,440 Removed unreliable, self-published sources and speculative content that bordered on original research. Added better source for definition. Rearranged some content for other sections. undothank Tags: Reverted Visual edit

Wikipedia use to be such a nice place where people helped each other out. Now it seems so hostile, with people trying to delete relevant and noteworthy content. If you provide a lot of references people claim wp:refbomb. If you provide to few people claim self published and or not noteworthy. LOL. If you quote sources, then you get dinged for copyright violation. If you write it yourself you get dinged for speculative content that borders original research. Can't win. :) Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Medium posts, YouTube videos (with the exception of the one from Business Insider), Truth Social posts, and company/personal blogs are all self-published and do not fit as reliable sources.

I saw that you had sources from news articles like Reuters and a Nature paper, which is good. I had moved statements cited by those sources to other sections in the article, where they would fit better.

We both agree that this article should not be deleted. However, the article as it was did not make a very strong case. Neither does complaining when your edits are given constructive criticism by other editors. I strongly recommend giving Wikipedia:Reliable sources a read for future editing. TotalVibe945 (talk) 13:46, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I searched for medium posts and youtube in the deleted text and didn't find any. Like I already said in previous revert there are many sources for the content. Instead of deleting the content you could delete the refs you don't like. Even better you can find refs yourself. And better would be to give others a chance to fix rather than deleting with incorrect claim of links to medium. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 19:21, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the article's current sources are unreliable and will eventually have to be removed. Please avoid social media, corporate and personal blogs, WP:FORBESCON, WP:BI, etc. Grayfell (talk) 09:15, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]