Wiki Article

Talk:Adolf Hitler

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Good articleAdolf Hitler has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 19, 2005Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 26, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 20, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
October 17, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 16, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article


Out of place text?

[edit]

The following two sentences immediately follow the Mein Kampf circulation figures and seem out of place there. It should at least be in its own paragraph if not moved elsewhere --

Shortly before Hitler was eligible for parole, the Bavarian government attempted to have him deported to Austria. The Austrian federal chancellor rejected the request on the specious grounds that his service in the German Army made his Austrian citizenship void. In response, Hitler formally renounced his Austrian citizenship on 7 April 1925. ~2025-37288-84 (talk) 22:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think a better place for that text is in #Brüning administration section. Agree? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:31, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Angry mustache man has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 6 § Angry mustache man until a consensus is reached. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi Party? Why not use the real name?

[edit]

The official name of Hitler's party is NSDAP or in full Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. The name "Nazi Party" is not an official name, nor has the term become established in colloquial speech as a synonym for the NSDAP. So why is it used in the introduction chapter here? Is it meant to avoid the official name and thereby to avoid the terms sozialistisch and Arbeiter? ~2025-39982-80 (talk) 15:20, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no, but it is the common one. That is why it is used, not because we want to hide the fact that it contains any words (like National, I.E. nationalist). Slatersteven (talk) 15:22, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]