Talk:Century common year

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Science Low‑importance Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 1 September 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Exceptional common year. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 1 September 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Century common year → Exceptional common yearExceptional common year – While this article is currently named "Century common year", the corresponding pages about individual such years (1700, 1800, and 1900) say "an exceptional common year starting on (day of the week)" instead of "a century common year starting on (day of the week)". So, for consistency, either this article should be named "Exceptional common year" instead, or Template:Year article header/zc should be modified to say "a century common year starting on (day of the week)" instead of "an exceptional common year starting on (day of the week)". GTrang (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 11:32, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose the current title is more neutral and accurate; "century" is an accurate descriptor of what these years are (they're the first year in the relevant century) where as "execeptional" sounds like a POV claim. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:45, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Science has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 11:32, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.