Talk:Cheyenne Mountain Complex

Cheyenne Mountain Complex is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by Tokeamour (talk) at 03:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the good article instructions. Short description: Training complex located in El Paso County, Colorado

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cheyenne Mountain Complex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cold War Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Aviation / Fortifications / North America / United States / Cold War B‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. B This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Fortifications task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Spaceflight Mid‑importance Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Civil engineering Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Architecture Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: Colorado Low‑importance United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us! Aviation Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Globus radar issue

The article claims By 1995, the AN/FPS-129 HAVE STARE (Globus II) radar in Norway had been upgraded to "relay data to Cheyenne Mountain", which is problematic because this radar was just going operational in California in 1995 and didn't get moved to Norway until '98/'99. Sadly I do not have access to the issues of the Guardian that are provided as a source for this statement. Maybe some editor just added the "in Norway" part without realizing that it was still in Cali at the time? -- Fyrael (talk) 21:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyrael I believe this was fixed by another editor (I believe) Tokeamour (talk) 01:53, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited content

It looks like there's a trend to add uncited content, which I find is generally original research (or they would have added a source).

I removed content that is not cited here. If someone would like to research this information, that would be wonderful!–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CaroleHenson I hope my contributions to the article helped! Tokeamour (talk) 05:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems to be very mangled

I don't feel equipped to fix it but it's almost unreadable at present. One-hundred-suns (talk) 23:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TBH, I agree, and am strongly considering reverting it back to prior to Tokeamour's edits based on this revision. I'm sorry that may cause a lot of wasted work, but the article has been completely mangled with broken English.⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 01:35, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not involved at all in Wikipedia (and I don't want to upset anyone) but I think something should be done, yes. The fact that it's so mangled is going to mean people don't trust what it says apart from anything else. Especially for an article which is going to get attention right now. One-hundred-suns (talk) 09:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Swatjester Should be fixed now, unless something could be edited. I apologize for the inconvenience. Tokeamour (talk) 01:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokeamour I would like to underline that your recent efforts have improved the article by a lot. Since you are still doing edits, please give a note when you are considering the work done, because as of today, there are still some places with bad grammar that could be improved. Havrekaill (talk) 13:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Havrekaill Understood, if you see any, then you should also do it, yourself :) (don't take this as being rude) Tokeamour (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Havrekaill Also I will do it on my end to! Tokeamour (talk) 18:59, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Havrekaill Also thank you so much, I hope when people edit the article it won't be as confusing (hopefully) Tokeamour (talk) 19:07, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]