Wiki Article

Talk:Garry Tan

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Twitter blocks

[edit]

This person has created a massive list of blocked Twitter accounts - see the thread announcing his promotion at Y Combinator in which poster after poster declares they've never even heard of the man and he's blocked them (this writer included): https://twitter.com/sama/status/1564256564180951040

Has anyone run across well-sourced material that discusses this? Definitely seems notable. 24.130.98.87 (talk) 06:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese name

[edit]

@SriTribhuvana is there a source of the Chinese name that you added? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garry_Tan&oldid=1121146934 🌊PacificDepthstalk|contrib 09:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. https://twitter.com/garrytan SriTribhuvana (talk) 13:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SriTribhuvana can we find a reliable source (not Twitter) to satisfy WP:RS? 🌊PacificDepthstalk|contrib 03:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Garry’s Tan bio to be updated, given he’s been heading Y Combinator for > 8 months now.

[edit]

I know Garry personally, so I only updated his title in the lead paragraph with a citation. Because his title was coming up wrong in the Google Knowledge Panels. Someone else should probably go through and actually update update. There is a lot in the news. Jenny8lee (talk) 07:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overreliant on Gil Duran

[edit]

This article is reliant on Gil Duran quotes to push a non-neutral POV hostile to Tan. If we have any kind of normative analysis of him, it should be in its own section, with a variety of sources. Hi! (talk) 08:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To centralize discussion, please comment under existing discussion at WP:NPOVN#Garry Tan and Balaji Srinivasan. Thank you. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YC leadership update

[edit]

Hello, page watchers. On behalf of the firm AI Training Inc., which has an interest in the quality of this page, I would like to propose a short addition that uses Forbes (staff) reporting on Tan's moves as president of YC. Following the current final sentence of the Career section, I propose to add:

As president, Tan restructured Y Combinator’s investment operations by winding down its Continuity Fund and transferring follow-on investment decisions to group partners. He also initiated a consolidated fundraising effort with a stated goal of raising $2 billion across new funds.<ref>{{cite news |title=Y Combinator Is Raising Billions In New Funding |last1=Konrad |first1=Alex |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2024/03/22/y-combinator-is-raising-billions-in-new-funding/ |work=Forbes |date=March 22, 2024 |accessdate=August 15, 2025}}</ref>

Given my financial COI, I will not make the edit myself. I am hopeful a volunteer editor will find this to be relevant and implement this text or a close variation thereof. Thanks, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 14:14, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Encoded  Talk 💬 21:17, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Politics section rewrite

[edit]

Hello again, page watchers. Having successfully proposed a small addition above, I'd like to suggest a bigger one: replacing the existing Politics section. I recognize this is a substantial change, so I want to explain why I think a complete replacement is preferable to incremental edit requests.

For some background, in March another editor cleaned up some POV wording in the section and noted in the edit summary: "this all should probably be re-written." Indeed, the current section is poorly organized, uses non-RS sources such as X/Twitter posts, and includes too many tangents and random opinions, likely derived from Tan's prolific social media use. For convenience, I've reproduced the content as of October 11, 2025 here:

The proposed replacement focuses on his actual political activities: his entry into SF politics, donations made, organizations joined, politicians supported and opposed, and combative style. It uses only reliable sources, and is more concise, organizing content into fewer, more focused paragraphs. See here:

To provide an example of my thinking and judgment calls made, let's consider the most contentious topic in the whole section, the 2024 tweet incident. The current version is actually a little too short, and potentially misleads through lack of context and hazy timeline:

In 2024, Tan posted a tweet wishing death on seven of the 11 members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. In a later apology, he said he was referencing a rap track.

The proposed version describes the sequence of events more clearly, removes the irrelevant detail about board size, identifies the track in question, and uses limited quotations for better context:

In January 2024, Tan posted a tweet stating that seven members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors should "die slow." He later deleted the tweet, a close paraphrase of the Tupac Shakur song "Hit 'Em Up", and apologized, stating "there is no place, no excuse and no reason for this type of speech."

Given my COI, I won't implement these changes myself. I hope other editors will find this a net improvement. I'm happy to answer questions or discuss concerns. Thanks for considering this request. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 23:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Whitewashing Likeanechointheforest (talk) 16:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Likeanechointheforest, I am curious if you found any of my critique persuasive? Perhaps this is too much to ask to change at once. What would you say to removing material sourced only to X/Twitter? WWB Too (Talk · COI) 15:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please call out that material again? Likeanechointheforest (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are two instances of Tan's X/Twitter feed being used in the current section, which you can see in the reflist above. The 1/1/25 tweet supports Tan having left the board of GrowSF; FWIW, in my draft I wrote "has served" to avoid having to verify "was". Later, the paragraph beginning "Tan called Y Combinator" is sourced to a tweet from 2/1/25. The book being discussed is also cited as a source, but is not a source; it's just linking to the book itself. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 20:22, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Partially implemented Likeanechointheforest (talk) 15:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking another look. I didn't intend for my draft to soften criticism of Tan, but I see how it could have that cumulative effect. I'll have another request soon that will also focus narrowly, and would welcome your review, if you're up for it. Thanks WWB Too (Talk · COI) 20:22, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Revising Politics section opening paragraph

[edit]

Following the discussion above about my previous COI edit request, I'd like to suggest another more focused proposal for the Politics section. Here is how the section begins now:

The problem is that several of these topics—self-driving cars, decelerationism, Apple's monopoly on apps, and censorship by YouTube—are not reflective of Tan's actual political activism. Read the San Francisco Standard article the list comes from (start with "Over the course of two hours") and it is clear the reporter is describing a few tweets from a single evening. I propose to replace it with:

This revision removes no criticism. Instead, it adds context about how Tan became involved in politics—something the current version lacks—while staying focused on verifiable activities rather than scattered opinions. I've omitted the "moderate Democrat" self-ID as less relevant, though I'm flexible on this. The current sources can be retained as they verify the same information. Below, I show how the sources support each claim:

One more thing: the SF Standard is currently a named ref within the article (<ref name=":3">) which I preserve in my draft. The NYT source is unnamed in the live article, but named in my draft. As before, because I am being paid to review this article, I will not make any changes on my own. What do other editors think about making this change? WWB Too (Talk · COI) 14:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done. NotJamestack (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NotJamestack, I appreciate you taking a look. However, when I look at the article and edit history, I don't see any changes. Did you intend to implement the suggested change? WWB Too (Talk · COI) 14:54, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@WWB Too The change was already done when I came to this edit request. NotJamestack (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@NotJamestack The previous edit request—about eliminating Twitter as a reference—was answered. However this edit request, about the first paragraph of the Politics section, has not been done. If you look at the live article it still mentions, for instance "deceleration" which my proposal would remove. Mind taking another look? WWB Too (Talk · COI) 20:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since the edit request has not been taken up, I've gone ahead and re-opened it. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 20:14, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to not do that part, back then, because I didn't think it fit, and I agree now Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:04, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do find that surprising. The current first paragraph is a grab-bag of opinions from a single night of tweeting. The proposed replacement explains how he got into politics in the first place, which serves as a better introduction for the rest of it. But thanks for following up. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 18:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding missing info about Garry Tan's entry to politics

[edit]

Hello, my previous suggestion of replacing the first paragraph met with some disagreement, so instead I'd like to propose adding new information without removing any existing content. I suggest inserting the following as a new second paragraph in the Politics section:

This passage adds context about when and how Tan became involved in politics—information not currently found in the article. It relies on RS citations already used in the section, specifically the The San Francisco Standard (currently (<ref name=":3">) and The New York Times (unnamed in the live article, but named in my draft). Given my COI, I won't implement this myself. If another editor finds this improves the article, I hope they'll consider adding it. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:02, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]