Talk:KidZui

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. San Diego Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject San Diego To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner. Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles. Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article. Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs. Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess. Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality. Get San Diego into Featured article status. Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

The content of ZuiTube was merged into KidZui on 21 April 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Engine?

..... so... what engine does this commie browser use? Pleeeeeaase don't tell me it's Trident, that would constitute burning of people.

is this safe from spywares, adwares, and the like? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.111.71.30 (talk) 06:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I first heard of this from AMO as a browser add-on (link currently at bottom of article), not a full-fledged browser itself; maybe it's based on Firefox? B7T (talk) 21:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Content

This article uses the company infobox, but mainly describes a software package. I would like the software infobox information added to the article; it might also be suitable to separate the article into two.

The information on content selection is also a bit scanty. I'd be fascinated to know how it classes Wikipedia, for instance.

Finally, frankly, some of the article sounds as if it was sourced, directly or indirectly, from promotional materials. It might be improved by a de-peacock, a de-weasel, and a criticism section. 75.156.133.118 (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding "references" from popular magazines (sourced from the company, no less) into company PR does not make it a legitimate article. Pls strip out the PR intro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.215.197.163 (talk) 12:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]