Talk:Trossachs

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland Low‑importance Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Forestry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hiking trails (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hiking trails, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Protected areas Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyvio?

This looks to be a copyvio of [1]. --128.135.230.115 (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gt Trossachs NNR v Trossachs

It is misleading to have the NNR in the infobox to a page that is not about the NNR but which nevertheless includes it. The NNR is but a subset of the Trossachs and might arguably be better to have its own page. A glimpse at the article might misled someone into thinking that the entire Trossachs was a category II landscape for example, which it is not - indeed the NP within which it is found is a category V landscape. Geopersona (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And, whilst I'm here, is not '(The) Trossachs' article one of those uncommon examples which ought to be titled with a preceding 'The' as in The Hague. Geopersona (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - I've replaced the infobox with a more standard "UK place" one. Zacwill (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muddled definiton

The definition of the region offered in the "Geography" section makes no sense. If the road between Stronachlachar and Aberfoyle is the western boundary of the Trossachs, then Glen Gyle, which lies northwest of Stronachlachar, can hardly be the southern boundary. A more logical southern bound would be Loch Ard or the Carse of Forth. Zacwill (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]