DZ
DefZone.Net

Kien thuc cong nghe & giai tri

  1. Trang chủ
  2. Wiki
Former featured article candidateUndertale is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleUndertale has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 16, 2016Good article nomineeListed
August 12, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
February 3, 2025Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Szmenderowiecki (talk) 13:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Created by Cassie Schebel (talk). Self-nominated at 14:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi Cassie Schebel, thanks for your interest in DYK! Unfortunately, the Undertale article is not eligible. According to the DYK rules, articles can only be nominated if they meet one of the following criteria: (1) created or moved to mainspace in the past seven days; (2) prose text expanded at least 5x in the past seven days; or (3) promoted to Good Article status in the past seven days. Since Undertale was already promoted to Good Article in 2016, it can't be nominated at this time. Let me know if you have any questions! DanCherek (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn’t have Temmie Chan on developers on this wiki

[edit]

Temmie chat was a key developer so was Toby Fox as well but he was the founder 2A02:C7E:2E32:7C00:58FA:B7F2:1302:4527 (talk) 18:24, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Her name is Temmie Chang. Gaemr1000 (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some thing wrong with

[edit]

for some reason the genre is role-playing although it's a rpg Classicalmanj (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RPG is short for "role-playing game".  novov talk edits 07:46, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you information Classicalmanj (talk) 09:39, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Togore Dreemurr" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Togore Dreemurr has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § Togore Dreemurr until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:35, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Togore" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Togore has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § Togore until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

10th Anniversary Stream

[edit]

What was the reason for deleting the section on the 10th Anniversary stream? The release of new content, battles, and music for the game is absolutely relevant and worthy of inclusion, especially if events such as the 5th anniversary concert receive mentions in the article. I feel that the quote from Fox is potentially superfluous, but provides good insight towards his attitude towards the community and encouraging fans to create additional content, AUs, etc. for the game. If it is poorly cited, then why delete the entire section rather than edit the article with better sources? Selina Dedalus (talk) 01:58, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a sentence or two describing the new content cited to reliable sources, but a whole paragraph is excessive IMO.  novov talk edits 22:55, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is the edit summary from the removal of this section, "Poorly cited section that doesn't really add anything constructive to this article. Not worthy of inclusion" and i agree with him. 1timeuse75 (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why? The release of new battles, content, and music seems significant at minimum. It makes sense why content such as the Spamton Sweepstakes is not included in the Deltarune page since it merely concerns teasers for upcoming content, but the release of original content makes it relevant of mention on a comprehensive encyclopedia about the topic. Selina Dedalus (talk) 22:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What determines of something is significant is generally not up to editor discretion. It is dependent on the sourcing, and how much weight the sources give towards those things. From what I can see, only one reliable source has discussed the contents of the stream at all [11]. But it isn't exactly significant enough for a section as its one of the classic articles that mainly regurgitate their points from social media posts. It doesn't really say much at all. I would estimate maybe one or two sentences would be worthy of inclusion in the article regarding it at best. These things may be significant to the fandom, but not in an encyclopedic overview on the topic. I maintain my stance that the content is not worthy of being in the article. λ NegativeMP1 22:49, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Selina Dedalus (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]