defzone.net@gmail.comLiên hệ
DZ
DefZone.Net

Kien thuc cong nghe & giai tri

Bai vietDia diemAlbum anhGameCua hang
  1. Home
  2. Wiki
Userboxes
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user helped promote Birbhum District to good article status.
This user has written or expanded 26 articles featured in the Did You Know section on the Main Page.
110,000+This user has made more than 110,000 contributions to Wikipedia.
 0.037% This user has created 2,600 of the 7,114,980 articles on the English language Wikipedia.
Wikipedia:Babel
Indian WikipedianThis user is an Indian Wikipedian.
bnবাংলা এই ব্যবহারকারীর মাতৃভাষা।
bn-1এই ব্যবহারকারী বাংলা স্তরে প্রাথমিক স্তরে প্রয়োগ করতে পারেন।
hi-1इस उपयोगकर्ता को हिन्दी भाषा का प्रारम्भिक स्तर का ज्ञान है।
Search user languages
  • Exceptional newcomer, presented on 11th March, 2009 to Chandan Guha by Bhadani
    Exceptional newcomer, presented on 11th March, 2009 to Chandan Guha by Bhadani
  • The India Star, Awarded to Chandan Guha for his excellent contributions on articles related to West Bengal.--GDibyendu (talk) 11 June 2009 (UTC)
    The India Star, Awarded to Chandan Guha for his excellent contributions on articles related to West Bengal.--GDibyendu (talk) 11 June 2009 (UTC)
  • The Indian Barnstar of National Merit, For your excellent work on Indian geography and efforts to improve article quality on important articles.-- Dr. Blofeld White cat 9 May 2010 (UTC)
    The Indian Barnstar of National Merit, For your excellent work on Indian geography and efforts to improve article quality on important articles.-- Dr. Blofeld White cat 9 May 2010 (UTC)
  • The Template BarnstarAwarded for Creating the much needed Rail route templates on the Indian Railway articles, Keep up the good work - ÐℬigXЯaɣ 3 April 2012 (UTC)
    The Template BarnstarAwarded for Creating the much needed Rail route templates on the Indian Railway articles, Keep up the good work - ÐℬigXЯaɣ 3 April 2012 (UTC)
  • The Original Barnstar For wonderful contribution to articles related to Indian Railways. Amartyabag TALK2ME 14:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
    The Original Barnstar For wonderful contribution to articles related to Indian Railways. Amartyabag TALK2ME 14:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
  • The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Congratulation for surpassing 35,000 edits. Dwaipayan (talk), 8 April 2013 (UTC)
    The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Congratulation for surpassing 35,000 edits. Dwaipayan (talk), 8 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Rail Gadi Barnstar Indian Railways has a unique position in our daily lives. From the first train travelled from Bombay to Thane in 1853 to Vision 2020; from Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali to Shahrukh Khan and Malaika Arora Khan's Chaiya Chiaya; from bravery of Riyaz Ahmed to some most terrible accidents in the nation's history — it has been a long journey. Thanks you very much for you tireless contribution to improve Indian Railways articles in Wikipedia. Tito Dutta (contact), 8 May 2013 (UTC)
    Rail Gadi Barnstar Indian Railways has a unique position in our daily lives. From the first train travelled from Bombay to Thane in 1853 to Vision 2020; from Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali to Shahrukh Khan and Malaika Arora Khan's Chaiya Chiaya; from bravery of Riyaz Ahmed to some most terrible accidents in the nation's history — it has been a long journey. Thanks you very much for you tireless contribution to improve Indian Railways articles in Wikipedia. Tito Dutta (contact), 8 May 2013 (UTC)
  • The Original Barnstar Great work! Pakuria block Maheshpur block and other Jharkhand pages Bongan® →TalkToMe←, 24 January 2016
    The Original Barnstar Great work! Pakuria block Maheshpur block and other Jharkhand pages
    Bongan® →TalkToMe←, 24 January 2016
  • The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Really great work on India-related articles, especially railways and East India. I cannot thank you enough Pratyush (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
    The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Really great work on India-related articles, especially railways and East India. I cannot thank you enough Pratyush (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
  • The Tireless Contributor Barnstar A branstar for your tireless contribution. -- Titodutta (talk) 09:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
    The Tireless Contributor Barnstar A branstar for your tireless contribution. -- Titodutta (talk) 09:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

  • v
  • t
  • e
Wikipedia key policies and guidelines (?)
  • Five pillars
    • Ignore all rules
Content (?)
P
  • Verifiability
  • No original research
  • Neutral point of view
  • What Wikipedia is not
  • Biographies of living persons
  • Copyright (Copyright violations)
  • Image use
  • Article titles
G
  • Notability
  • Autobiography
  • Citing sources
  • Reliable sources
    • Medicine
  • Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
  • Plagiarism
  • Do not create hoaxes
  • Fringe theories
  • Patent nonsense
  • External links
Conduct (?)
P
  • Civility
  • Consensus
  • Harassment
  • Vandalism
  • Ignore all rules
  • No personal attacks
  • Ownership of content
  • Edit warring
  • Dispute resolution
  • Sockpuppetry
  • No legal threats
  • Child protection
  • Paid-contribution disclosure
G
  • Assume good faith
  • Conflict of interest
  • Disruptive editing
  • Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
  • Etiquette
  • Gaming the system
  • Please do not bite the newcomers
  • Courtesy vanishing
  • Responding to threats of harm
  • Talk page guidelines
    • Signatures
Deletion (?)
P
  • Deletion policy
  • Proposed deletion
    • Biographies
  • Speedy deletion
  • Attack page
  • Oversight
  • Revision deletion
Enforcement (?)
P
  • Administrators
  • Banning
  • Blocking
  • Page protection
Editing (?)
P
  • Editing policy
G
  • Article size
    • Summary style
  • Be bold
  • Disambiguation
  • Hatnotes
  • Broad-concept article
  • Understandability
Style
  • Manual of Style
    • Contents
  • Accessibility
  • Dates and numbers
  • Images
  • Layout
  • Lead section
  • Linking
  • Lists
Classification
  • Categories, lists, and navigation templates
  • Categorization
  • Template namespace
Project content (?)
G
  • Project namespace
    • WikiProjects
  • User pages
    • User boxes
  • Shortcuts
  • Subpages
WMF (?)
P
  • Universal Code of Conduct
  • Terms of Use
  • List of policies
  • Friendly space policy
  • Licensing and copyright
  • Privacy policy
  • List of all policies and guidelines
    • P: List of policies
    • G: List of guidelines
  • Summaries of values and principles
  • FAQ
  • v
  • t
  • e
Wikipedia principles
   

Five pillars
Statement of our principles

Jimbo's statement
Historic principles

Simplified ruleset
Synopsis of our conventions

Wikimedia principles
Common to all projects
(in Meta-Wiki)

Principles
Other essays on Wikipedia's principles

  • v
  • t
  • e
Wikipedia essays (?)
Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
Philosophy
  • Articles are more important than policy
  • Articles must be written
  • All Five Pillars are equally important
  • Avoid vague introductions
  • Civil POV pushing
  • Cohesion
  • Competence is required
  • Concede lost arguments
  • Dissent is not disloyalty
  • Don't lie
  • Don't search for objections
  • Duty to comply
  • Editing Wikipedia is like visiting a foreign country
  • Editors will sometimes be wrong
  • Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
  • Explanationism
  • External criticism of Wikipedia
  • Five pillars
  • Here to build an encyclopedia
  • Large language models
  • Leave it to the experienced
  • Levels of competence
  • Levels of consensus
  • Most ideas are bad
  • Need
  • Not broken is ugly
  • Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction
  • Not every article can be a Featured Article
  • The one question
  • Oversimplification
  • Paradoxes
  • Paraphrasing
  • POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
  • Process is important
  • Product, process, policy
  • Purpose
  • Reasonability rule
  • Systemic bias
  • There is no seniority
  • Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
  • Tendentious editing
  • The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
  • The rules are principles
  • Trifecta
  • We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
  • Wikipedia in brief
  • Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
  • Wikipedia is a community
  • Wikipedia is not RationalWiki
Article construction
  • 100K featured articles
  • Abandoned stubs
  • Acronym overkill
  • Adding images improves the encyclopedia
  • Advanced text formatting
  • Akin's Laws of Article Writing
  • Alternatives to the "Expand" template
  • Amnesia test
  • A navbox on every page
  • An unfinished house is a real problem
  • Archive your sources
  • Article revisions
  • Articles have a half-life
  • Autosizing images
  • Avoid mission statements
  • Be neutral in form
  • Beef up that first revision
  • Blind men and an elephant
  • BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
  • Build content to endure
  • Cherrypicking
  • Chesterton's fence
  • Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
  • Citation overkill
  • Citation underkill
  • Common-style fallacy
  • Concept cloud
  • Creating controversial content
  • Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
  • Dictionaries as sources
  • Don't cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia
  • Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
  • Don't get hung up on minor details
  • Don't hope the house will build itself
  • Don't panic
  • Don't "teach the controversy"
  • Editing on mobile devices
  • Editors are not mindreaders
  • Encourage the newcomers
  • Endorsements (commercial)
  • Featured articles may have problems
  • Formatting bilateral relations articles
  • Formatting bilateral relations templates
  • Fruit of the poisonous tree
  • Give an article a chance
  • How to write a featured article
  • Identifying and using independent sources
    • History sources
    • Law sources
    • Primary sources
    • Science sources
    • Style guides
    • Tertiary sources
  • Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
  • Introduction to structurism
  • Link rot
  • Mine a source
  • Merge Test
  • Minors and persons judged incompetent
  • "Murder of" articles
  • Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
  • Not everything needs a navbox
  • Not everything needs a template
  • Nothing is in stone
  • Obtain peer review comments
  • Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
  • Permastub
  • Potential, not just current state
  • Presentism
  • Principle of Some Astonishment
  • The problem with elegant variation
  • Pro and con lists
  • Printability
  • Publicists
  • Put a little effort into it
  • Restoring part of a reverted edit
  • Robotic editing
  • Sham consensus
  • Source your plot summaries
  • Specialized-style fallacy
  • Stublet
  • Stub Makers
  • Run an edit-a-thon
  • Temporary versions of articles
  • Tertiary-source fallacy
  • There are no shortcuts to neutrality
  • There is no deadline
  • There is a deadline
  • The deadline is now
  • Try not to leave it a stub
  • What is a reliable source
  • Understanding Wikipedia's content standards
  • Walled garden
  • What an article should not include
  • Wikipedia is a work in progress
  • Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion
  • The world will not end tomorrow
  • Write the article first
  • Writing better articles
Writing article content
  • Avoid thread mode
  • Copyediting reception sections
  • Coup
  • Don't throw more litter onto the pile
  • Gender-neutral language
  • Myth vs fiction
  • Proseline
  • Reading in a flow state
  • Turning biology research into a Wikipedia article
  • Use our own words
  • We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
  • Write the article first
  • Writing about women
  • Writing better articles
Removing or
deleting content
  • Adjectives in your recommendations
  • AfD is not a war zone
  • Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
  • Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
  • Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
  • Arguments to make in deletion discussions
  • Avoid repeated arguments
  • Before commenting in a deletion discussion
  • But there must be sources!
  • Confusing arguments mean nothing
  • Content removal
  • Counting and sorting are not original research
  • Delete or merge
  • Delete the junk
  • Deletion is not cleanup
  • Does deletion help?
  • Don't attack the nominator
  • Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
  • Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
  • Emptying categories out of process
  • Follow the leader
  • How the presumption of notability works
  • How to save an article nominated for deletion
  • I just don't like it
  • Identifying blatant advertising
  • Identifying test edits
  • Immunity
  • Keep it concise
  • Liar liar pants on fire
  • No Encyclopedic Use
  • Nothing
  • Nothing is clear
  • Overzealous deletion
  • Relisting can be abusive
  • Relist bias
  • The Heymann Standard
  • Unopposed AFD discussion
  • Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole
  • Why was the page I created deleted?
  • What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
  • When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
  • Zombie page
Essays on civility
The basics
  • Accepting other users
  • Apology
  • Autistic editors
  • Being right isn't enough
  • Contributing to complicated discussions
  • Divisiveness
  • Don't retaliate
  • Editors' pronouns
  • Edit at your own pace
  • Encouraging the newcomers
  • Enjoy yourself
  • Expect no thanks
  • How to be civil
  • Maintaining a friendly space
  • Negotiation
  • Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
  • Please say please
  • Relationships with academic editors
  • Thank you
  • Too long; didn't read
  • Truce
  • Unblock perspectives
  • We are all Wikipedians here
  • You have a right to remain silent
Philosophy
  • A thank you never hurts
  • A weak personal attack is still wrong
  • Advice for hotheads
  • An uncivil environment is a poor environment
  • Be the glue
  • Beware of the tigers!
  • Civility warnings
  • Deletion as revenge
  • Duty to comply
  • Failure
  • Forgive and forget
  • It's not the end of the world
  • Nobody cares
  • Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
  • On Wikipedia no one knows I'm a dog
  • Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
  • Profanity, civility, and discussions
  • Revert notification opt-out
  • Shadowless Fists of Death!
  • Staying cool when the editing gets hot
  • The grey zone
  • The last word
  • There is no Divine Right of Editors
  • Most ideas are bad
  • Nothing is clear
  • Reader
  • The rules of polite discourse
  • There is no common sense
  • Two wrongs don't make a right
  • Wikipedia clichés
  • Wikipedia is not about winning
  • Wikipedia should not be a monopoly
  • Writing for the opponent
Dos
  • Assume good faith
  • Assume the assumption of good faith
  • Assume no clue
  • Avoid personal remarks
  • Avoid the word "vandal"
  • Be excellent to one another
  • Be pragmatic
  • Beyond civility
  • Call a spade a spade
  • Candor
  • Deny recognition
  • Desist
  • Discussing cruft
  • Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
  • Encourage full discussions
  • Get over it
  • How to lose
  • Imagine others complexly
  • Just drop it
  • Keep it concise
  • Keep it down to earth
  • Mind your own business
  • Say "MOBY"
  • Mutual withdrawal
  • Read before commenting
  • Read the room
  • Settle the process first
  • You can search, too
Don'ts
  • ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
  • Wikipedia:Because I can
  • Civil POV pushing
  • Cyberbullying
  • Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
  • Don't be a fanatic
  • Don't be a jerk
  • Don't be an ostrich
  • Don't be ashamed
  • Don't be a WikiBigot
  • Don't be high-maintenance
  • Don't be inconsiderate
  • Don't be obnoxious
  • Don't be prejudiced
  • Don't be rude
  • Don't be the Fun Police
  • Don't bludgeon the process
  • Don't call a spade a spade
  • Don't call people by their real name
  • Don't call the kettle black
  • Don't call things cruft
  • Don't come down like a ton of bricks
  • Don't cry COI
  • Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
  • Don't eat the troll's food
  • Don't fight fire with fire
  • Don't give a fuck
  • Don't help too much
  • Don't ignore community consensus
  • Don't knit beside the guillotine
  • Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
  • Don't remind others of past misdeeds
  • Don't shout
  • Don't spite your face
  • Don't take the bait
  • Don't template the regulars
  • Don't throw your toys out of the pram
  • Do not insult the vandals
  • Griefing
  • Hate is disruptive
  • Nationalist editing
  • No angry mastodons
    • just madmen
  • No ableism
  • No Nazis
  • No racists
  • No Confederates
  • No queerphobia
  • No, you can't have a pony
  • Passive aggression
  • POV railroad
  • Superhatting
  • There are no oracles
  • There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
  • You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
  • UPPERCASE
WikiRelations
  • WikiBullying
  • WikiCrime
  • WikiHarassment
  • WikiHate
  • WikiLawyering
  • WikiLove
  • WikiPeace
Essays on neutrality
  • Academic bias
  • Activist
  • Advocacy
  • Avoid thread mode
  • Be neutral in form
  • Blind men and an elephant
  • Cherrypicking
  • Civil POV pushing
  • Coatrack
  • Controversial articles
  • Creating controversial content
  • Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
  • Criticism
  • Describing points of view
  • Don't "teach the controversy"
  • Endorsements
  • Let the reader decide
  • Inaccuracy
  • Myth vs fiction
  • NPOV dispute
  • Neutral and proportionate point of view
  • Not Wikipedia's fault
  • POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
  • Partisans
  • Partisanship
  • Presentism
  • Pro and con lists
  • Systemic bias
  • Tendentious editing
  • There are no shortcuts to neutrality
  • Wikipedia:Truth
  • We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
  • We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
  • What is fringe?
  • Why Wikipedia cannot claim the Earth is not flat
  • Wikipedia is not RationalWiki
Essays on notability
  • Advanced source searching
  • All high schools can be notable
  • Alternative outlets
  • Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
  • Articles with a single source
  • Avoid template creep
  • Bare notability
  • Big events make key participants notable
  • Businesses with a single location
  • But it's true!
  • Common sourcing mistakes
  • Clones
  • Coatrack
  • Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
  • Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
  • Every snowflake is unique
  • Existence ≠ Notability
  • Existence does not prove notability
  • Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
  • Google searches and numbers
  • How the presumption of notability works
  • High schools
  • Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
  • Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
  • Independent sources
  • Inherent notability
  • Insignificant
  • Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it
  • Masking the lack of notability
  • Make stubs
  • Minimum coverage
  • News coverage does not decrease notability
  • No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
  • No one cares about your garage band
  • No one really cares
  • Notability and tornadoes
  • Notability cannot be purchased
  • Notability comparison test
  • Notability is not a level playing field
  • Notability is not a matter of opinion
  • Notability is not relevance or reliability
  • Notability means impact
  • Notabilitymandering
  • Not all Vocaloid songs deserve their own article
  • Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
  • Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
  • Offline sources
  • One sentence does not an article make
  • Other stuff exists
  • Overreliance upon Google
  • Perennial websites
  • Popularity ≠ Notability
  • Read the source
  • Red flags of non-notability
  • Reducing consensus to an algorithm
  • Run-of-the-mill
  • Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
  • Significance is not a formula
  • Source content comes first!
  • Sources must be out-of-universe
  • Subjective importance
  • Third-party sources
  • Trivial mentions
  • Video links
  • Vanispamcruftisement
  • What BLP1E is not
  • What is and is not routine coverage
  • What notability is not
  • What to include
  • Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?
  • Wikipedia is not Crunchbase
  • Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
  • Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé
  • Two prongs of merit
Humorous essays
  • Adminitis
  • Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
  • Akin's Laws of Article Writing
  • Alternatives to edit warring
  • ANI flu
  • Anti-Wikipedian
  • Anti-Wikipedianism
  • Articlecountitis
  • Asshole John rule
  • Assume bad faith
  • Assume faith
  • Assume good wraith
  • Assume stupidity
  • Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
  • Avoid using the preview button
  • Avoid using wikilinks
  • Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
  • Barnstaritis
  • Before they were notable
  • Be the fun police
  • BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle
  • Boston Tea Party
  • Butterfly effect
  • CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
  • Case against LLM-generated articles
  • Complete bollocks
  • Counting forks
  • Counting juntas
  • Crap
  • Delete the main page
  • Diffusing conflict
  • Don't stuff beans up your nose
  • Don't-give-a-fuckism
  • Don't abbreviate "Wikipedia" as "Wiki"!
  • Don't delete the main page
  • Editcountitis
  • Edits Per Day
  • Editsummarisis
  • Editing under the influence
  • Embrace Stop Signs
  • Emerson
  • Fart
  • Five Fs of Wikipedia
  • Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
  • Go ahead, vandalize
  • How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
  • How to get away with UPE
  • How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
  • How to vandalize correctly
  • How to win a citation war
  • Ignore all essays
  • Ignore all user warnings
  • Ignore every single rule
  • Is that even an essay?
  • Keep beating the horse
  • Mess with the templates
  • My local pond
  • Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
  • Legal vandalism
  • List of jokes about Wikipedia
  • LTTAUTMAOK
  • No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
  • No episcopal threats
  • No one cares about your garage band
  • No one really cares
  • No, really
  • No self attacks
  • Notability is not eternal
  • Oops Defense
  • Play the game
  • Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
  • Please bite the newbies
  • Please do not murder the newcomers
  • Pledge of Tranquility
  • R-e-s-p-e-c-t
  • Requests for medication
  • Requirements for adminship
  • Rouge admin
  • Rouge editor
  • Sarcasm is really helpful
  • Sausages for tasting
  • Spaling Muich?
  • Template madness
  • The Night Before Wikimas
  • The first rule of Wikipedia
  • The Five Pillars of Untruth
  • Things that should not be surprising
  • The WikiBible
  • Watchlistitis
  • We are deletionist!
  • Why is BFDI on Wikipedia?
  • Why you shouldn't write articles with ChatGPT, according to ChatGPT
  • Wikipedia is an MMORPG
  • Yes, falsely
  • Yes legal threats
  • Yes personal attacks
  • You don't have to be mad to work here, but
  • You should not write meaningless lists
About essays
About essays
  • Essay guide
  • Value of essays
  • Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
  • Don't cite essays as if they were policy
  • Avoid writing redundant essays
  • Finding an essay
  • Quote your own essay
Policies and guidelines
  • About policies and guidelines
    • Policies
    • Guidelines
  • How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance
  • Policy writing is hard
  • v
  • t
  • e
Wikipediholism
Identification
  • Signs of Wikipediholism
  • Wikipediholism test
    • legacy
    • modern
  • Wikipediholic userbox 1
  • Wikipediholic userbox 2
Analysis and
symptoms
  • Who, why? (inactive)
  • Wikipedihol
  • Wikipedia is an MMORPG
  • Editcountitis
  • Editsummarisis
  • Articlecountitis
  • Barnstaritis
  • Adminitis
  • Templatitis
  • Watchlistitis
  • Userboxitis
  • Talk page stalking
  • WikiProphecy
Fighting
Wikipediholism
  • Recovering from Wikipediholism
  • Wikipatch
  • Wikipediholics in denial
  • Clinic for Wikipediholics
  • Confessed Wikipediholics
  • Wikipediholic user warning templates
  • Taking a Wikibreak
Wikipediholics listed by...
  • Number of edits
    • page 2
  • Number of recent edits (inactive)
  • Active editing streak
  • Number of manual edits
  • Article count
    • page 2
  • Featured article nominations
  • Good article nominations
  • Thanks received
  • User page watchers
  • Bot edits
  • v
  • t
  • e
Wikipedia templates
Main namespace
  • General
  • Cleanup
    • Verifiability and sources
  • Disputes
  • Hatnotes
  • Infoboxes
  • Links
    • External link templates
    • Linking country articles
  • Lists
  • Main page
  • Section
  • Sources of articles
    • Quick reference
  • Standard boxes
  • Stub types
  • Translation
Other namespaces
  • Compact TOC
  • Category
  • File
  • Talk
  • Template
  • User
    • Userboxes
  • User talk
  • Wikipedia
    • WikiProject banners
All namespaces
  • Deletion
    • Speedy
  • Formatting
  • Maintenance
  • Merging
  • Moving
    • Requested
  • Navigation
  • Redirect pages
    • Functional index
    • Language codes
  • Splitting
  • Wikimedia sister projects
Navboxes
with templates
  • Archiving
  • Articles for deletion
  • Birth, death and age
  • Button
  • Category header
  • Citation and verifiability
  • Citation Style 1
  • Deletion review
  • Editnotice
  • Hatnotes
  • Help desk
  • Inline cleanup
  • Introduction cleanup
  • IPA
  • Math
  • Notice and warnings
  • Organization infoboxes
  • Proposed article mergers
  • Protection
  • Quotation
  • Redirects
  • Search
  • Semantics
  • Speedy deletion
    • Notices
  • String-handling
  • Sup and sub-related
  • Top icon
  • Transwiki maintenance
  • Unicode
  • User talk pages
  • User noticeboard notices
  • Userboxes
    • User rights
  • Userspace linking
  • Userspace disclaimers
  • Wikibreak
  • WikiLove
Inline images
  • Wikipedia icons
  • Discussion icons
  • Comment icons
  • Emoji
Help pages
  • Template documentation
  • Examples of templates
  • Maintenance template removal
  • Requested templates
  • Template help
    • Quick guide
  • Favorite templates
  • Template namespace
Related topics
  • WikiProject Templates
  • Index
    • Category
Search
  • Category
  • v
  • t
  • e
Quick links, handy while contributing in Wikipedia
Templates
{{Refimprove}} · {{citation needed}} · {{cleanup}} · {{cleanup-rewrite}} · {{Expand section}} · {{reflist}}  · {{Weasel-word}}  · {{Multiple issues}} · {{WP Bangladesh|class=|importance=}}  · {{Notability}}  · {{No footnotes}}  · {{prod2}}  · {{subst:welcome}} --~~~~
Wikipedia
University  · Citing_sources  · Requests for page protection  · Edit summary legend  · UNIGUIDE  · MOS  · WP:COPYEDIT  · WP:NOOB  · WP:NPP  · WP:NPPLOG  · WP:DEL
WikiProject
Stub types ·
WikiMark
Navbox  · Table  · Wikitable · {{Div col}} · {{Image gallery}}
Watch
NewPages  · RecentChanges
DZ
DefZone.Net

Noi chia se kien thuc, huong dan va kham pha cong nghe.

Lien ket nhanh

Trang chủBài viếtWikiCửa hàngLiên hệ

Liên hệ

Email: defzone.net@gmail.com
Điện thoại: +84 762 559 696
Địa chỉ: Thiên Hương, Thủy Nguyên, Hải Phòng

Đăng ký nhận tin

Nhận bài viết và cập nhật mới nhất qua email.

© 2026 DefZone.Net. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsSitemap