Wiki Article

User:RAJIVVASUDEV

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Rainbow bee-eater

The rainbow bee-eater (Merops ornatus) is a bird species in the family Meropidae, the bee-eaters. It is found during the summer in forested areas in most of southern Australia, excluding Tasmania, migrating to the north of the country as well as New Guinea and some of the southern islands of Indonesia in the winter. It inhabits open woodlands, beaches, dunes, cliffs, mangroves, and farmlands, and visits parks and private gardens. The rainbow bee-eater is a brilliantly coloured bird that grows between 23 and 28 centimetres (9.1 and 11.0 in) in length, including the elongated tail feathers, with a weight of 20 to 33 grams (0.71 to 1.16 oz). Its diet consists mostly of flying insects and especially bees, as implied by its name. Like all bee-eaters, it is a social bird; when not breeding, individuals roost together in large groups. This rainbow bee-eater perching on a twig was photographed in the Fogg Dam Conservation Reserve near Middle Point in the Northern Territory, Australia.

Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp
FRV DANA

RV is my pseudonym, and I am a textile professional and an avid reader with a strong interest in learning about new technologies. I have a passion for both historical and modern textile subjects, and the majority of my editing work focuses on topics related to textiles.

Welcome to my User Page

[edit]

Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are. — User:Ian.thomson

Tip of the day

[edit]
Article quality assessments

One of the most common methods used by WikiProject contributors to monitor and prioritize their work is that of assessing the articles within their scope. The de facto standard for these assessments is the Version 1.0 Editorial Team's assessment scale (shown below).

FA  – The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review.
A  – The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
GA  – The article has attained good article status by passing an official review.
B  – The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
C  – The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
Start  – An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.
Stub  – A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category.

For a basic overview of article assessment, please see the Assessment FAQ.


To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Motto

[edit]
Bookshelf

Today's motto...

Extra! Extra! Read all about it!

Hook update

[edit]
Hook update
Your hook reached 15,970 views (665.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2022 – nice work!
Hook update
Your hook reached 14,794 views (616.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2023 – nice work!
Hook update
Your hook reached 19,051 views (793.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2023 – nice work!

User boxes

[edit]
My User boxes
This user is a participant in WikiProject Reliability.
This user is a member of the WikiProject Unreferenced articles.
This editor is a WikiGnome.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Textile arts.
This user is a member of the Fashion WikiProject.
This user is a Microwikipædian.
This user uses HotCat.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Short descriptions.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user fixes citations with the help of Citation bot.
This user is a WikiSloth.
This user is a native of Asia.
I try to do the right thing. If I make a mistake, please let me know.
This user has written or expanded 34 articles featured in the Did You Know section on the Main Page.
What did you do?This user includes edit summaries in their contributions and thinks that everyone else should use them too.
This user has been vaccinated against COVID-19.
This user is interested in the
Middle Ages

The barnstar

[edit]
Your contributions are appreciated.
Great work on adding to and helping to preserve Bolt 7&6=thirteen () 15:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your efforts in building up the encyclopedia. 7&6=thirteen () 18:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
The Christianity Barnstar
Dear RAJIVVASUDEV, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of care cloth. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 08:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Rescue list

[edit]

Tips and tools

[edit]

Objective

[edit]
  • Wikipedia's goal is to build and maintain an encyclopedia covering all branches of human knowledge.[1]
  • Medical topics: Jimmy Wales response

No, you have to be kidding me. Every single person who signed this petition needs to go back to check their premises and think harder about what it means to be honest, factual, truthful.

Wikipedia’s policies around this kind of thing are exactly spot-on and correct. If you can get your work published in respectable scientific journals – that is to say, if you can produce evidence through replicable scientific experiments, then Wikipedia will cover it appropriately. What we won’t do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of “true scientific discourse. It isn’t.

Nicely done. Wales is essentially saying, we have standards. Deal with it.[2][3]

  • Wikipedia co-founder calls alt-medicine practitioners “lunatic charlatans”[4]
  • Knowledge is often defined as justified true belief.
    Knowledge, Awareness of facts or being competent.
  1. ^ "Wikipedia:Did you know", Wikipedia, 2021-07-08, retrieved 2021-08-04
  2. ^ March 24, oracknows on; 2014. "An excellent response to complaints about medical topics on Wikipedia | ScienceBlogs". scienceblogs.com. Retrieved 2023-04-03. {{cite web}}: |last2= has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ "Standards of Evidence – Wikipedia Edition - NeuroLogica Blog". NeuroLogica Blog - Your Daily Fix of Neuroscience, Skepticism, and Critical Thinking. 2014-03-25. Retrieved 2023-04-03.
  4. ^ Geuss, Megan (2014-03-25). "Wikipedia founder calls alt-medicine practitioners "lunatic charlatans"". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2023-04-03.