Wiki Article

User talk:AndrewLooperman

Nguồn dữ liệu từ Wikipedia, hiển thị bởi DefZone.Net

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Allen Worthy (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires more significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Coverage should also focus on the subject, and not songs/albums, and WP:USERGEN sources like Discogs should be avoided. I'm also confused about the table of songwriting credits – how is he credited for something in 1990, when he was born in 1992??
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nil🥝 01:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AndrewLooperman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nil🥝 01:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Artissen (December 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please note that Discogs is not a reliable source. Skopemag and ArtistTrack both appear to accept payment for featuring artists, and it doesn't appear that they label or disclose their sponsored content. I'm fairly sceptical that this, for instance, is an entirely independent source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]